Well your #1 priority should be to fix what you broke. Since revert does not remove the commit, you don't need to hurry with "saving it" or anything - first revert and push to fix what you broke, then you can go about cherry-picking it to where you needed the code in.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I completely agree. I think this is a better solution than my post. Let me run this past you...
First I can get the commit into the correct branch with:
git checkout Branch2
git cherry-pick 65c356c8c
I then undo the other commit with:
git checkout Branch1
git revert 65c356c8c
Is that your suggestion?
Well your #1 priority should be to fix what you broke. Since
revertdoes not remove the commit, you don't need to hurry with "saving it" or anything - first revert and push to fix what you broke, then you can go about cherry-picking it to where you needed the code in.