To be fair github started using "github flavored markdown" (which basically means that if you clone a repository on any other host your readme.md will not display correctly) loooong before Microsoft every thought about buying them.
I'm on board with GFM, especially now it has become a de-facto standard (albeit one among several). Ideally there'd be a proper spec for it, but there isn't one of those even for the original version of Markdown.
The problem with gh-* hash params is that it forces other implementers of GFM to implement this explicitly GitHub-centric API that even end users have to know about. I mean maybe that's intentional from a "branding" point of view, but it's incredibly obnoxious from a design point of view.
Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
To be fair github started using "github flavored markdown" (which basically means that if you clone a repository on any other host your readme.md will not display correctly) loooong before Microsoft every thought about buying them.
I'm on board with GFM, especially now it has become a de-facto standard (albeit one among several). Ideally there'd be a proper spec for it, but there isn't one of those even for the original version of Markdown.
The problem with
gh-*hash params is that it forces other implementers of GFM to implement this explicitly GitHub-centric API that even end users have to know about. I mean maybe that's intentional from a "branding" point of view, but it's incredibly obnoxious from a design point of view.