A term sheet looks like a list of boring legal terms, and that is exactly how founders get hurt. A handful of clauses that seem minor on the page can quietly reshape who earns what when the company sells. Whether you are the investor writing the offer or the founder receiving it, it pays to read a term sheet as a single question: how favorable are these terms to the founder versus the investor?
You can almost score it. At the founder-friendly end sits a clean, market-standard deal: a one-times non-participating liquidation preference, broad-based weighted-average anti-dilution, a board that is not stacked against the founder, and standard four-year vesting with a one-year cliff. At the hostile end, the same structure turns predatory: a liquidation preference above one-times, participating preferences that let the investor double-dip, full-ratchet anti-dilution, extra board control, and redemption rights that let the investor force a buyback.
Take liquidation preference, the clause that decides who gets paid first in a sale. A one-times non-participating preference means the investor gets their money back or converts to shares, not both. Bump that to participating, or to a two-times multiple, and in a modest exit the investor can take most of the proceeds before the founders see a dollar. Same company, same exit price, wildly different outcome for the people who built it.
Anti-dilution is the other quiet killer. Broad-based weighted-average is normal and fair; full-ratchet means that if the company ever raises at a lower price, the early investor is repriced as if they had always paid that lower price, at the founders' expense. It rarely matters until the day it matters enormously.
The practical move is to benchmark every term against what is actually market for the stage, not against the offer in front of you. An offer can look reasonable in isolation and still be well outside norms on three or four terms at once. Lining each term up against the market, and against the investor's own past deals, turns a wall of legalese into a clear picture of where the deal is standard and where it is aggressive.
Most terms are negotiable. The founders who negotiate well are simply the ones who knew which clauses to fight for.
Top comments (0)