TSMC Material Information — NVDA Quantitative Valuation Record
End-to-End Numeric Flow
Source/timing → information gap → expectation gap → market confirmation
→ one LLM key-factor number per call → pricing-model contributions
→ priced-in adjustment → historical efficiency → residual forecasts → score
Enter fullscreen mode
Exit fullscreen mode
1. Event, Source and Timeliness
Event ID: 07bead29882ef15c2b7502e260bca4e04c947e48
Asset / category: NVDA / semiconductor_supply_chain
Event time: 2026-09-07T15:33:11.751018+00:00
Source: tsmc_latest_news (tier 3)
Metric
Value
Source tier
3
Fetch latency
0.0s (estimated from polling)
Direction hint
unknown
Liquidity gate
1
2. Information Gap and Prior Diffusion
Metric
Value
Meaning
Novelty
1.000
1 − maximum recent similarity
Staleness
0.000
Maximum recent similarity
Similarity gap
> window
Time since a sufficiently similar story
Pre-event drift
+0.00 bps
Frozen pre-event window
Phase-1 priced-in score
0.000
Direction-aligned drift channel
Information-gap composite
1.000
Novelty and unpriced blend
Verdict
fresh_unpriced
Prediction gate
3. Expectation Gap and Metric Revisions
Metric
Numeric value
Expectation-gap direction
+0
Expectation-gap magnitude
0.33
Revised metric
Direction
Magnitude
Signed magnitude
revenue
flat
0.00%
+0.00%
gross_margin
flat
0.00%
+0.00%
fcf
flat
0.00%
+0.00%
eps_revision
flat
0.00%
+0.00%
capex
flat
0.00%
+0.00%
valuation
flat
0.00%
+0.00%
4. Market and Microstructure Confirmation
Metric
Value
Normalized score
Spot price
229.8300
—
5-second change
-32.53 bps
—
60-second change
-32.09 bps
—
Trend
—
1.000
Volume ratio
0.01×
0.000
Trade-count ratio
0.00×
—
VWAP deviation
-18.39 bps
—
Confirmation move
+0.00 bps
—
Order-flow imbalance
0.383
—
Microstructure
—
0.211
Signal composite
—
0.453
5. Text → Numeric Key Factors
Each LLM call returns one number. Rows are ordered by absolute weighted valuation impact.
Rank
Parameter
Numeric shock
Valuation contribution
Rationale
1
revenue_growth
+2.00%
+2.15%
TSMC's material information suggests potential supply chain impacts that could modestly affect NVDA'
2
fcf_margin
+2.00%
+1.45%
TSMC's material information likely indicates stable operations, but given no specific details, a con
3
eps_revision
+2.00%
+0.88%
TSMC's material information suggests potential earnings revision, but given the lack of specifics, a
4
capex
+5.00%
-0.85%
TSMC's material information likely indicates significant capital expenditure plans, which could affe
5
gross_margin
+2.00%
+0.84%
TSMC's material information likely indicates stable or improved manufacturing efficiency, modestly l
6. Pricing Models and Weighted Valuation Change
Model
Applicability weight
Raw Δ fair value
Weighted Δ
dcf
35%
+9.20%
+3.22%
forward_pe
30%
+3.00%
+0.90%
fcf_yield
20%
-0.50%
-0.10%
peg
15%
+3.00%
+0.45%
7. Priced-In and Expectation-Gap Adjustment
implied_delta = Σ(model weight × Σ(parameter shock × elasticity))
priced_in = max(aligned price drift, historical information diffusion)
expected_residual = implied_delta × (1 - priced_in) × reaction_efficiency
Enter fullscreen mode
Exit fullscreen mode
Quantity
Value
Interpretation
Implied fair-value change
+4.47% (+447 bps)
Before market-pricing adjustment
Already priced in
0.0%
Price and diffusion channels
Historical reaction efficiency
0.0%
Robust asset/category median
Expected residual move
+0.0 bps
Remaining quantified expectation gap
8. Multi-Horizon Numeric Forecast
Horizon
Direction code
Magnitude
Confidence
unavailable
0
0.0 bps
0.0%
9. Composite Score Decomposition
Section
Sub-item
Score
Maximum
Utilization
Evidence
news_signal
channel
3.0
5.0
60.0%
source=tsmc_latest_news tier=3
news_signal
novelty
10.0
10.0
100.0%
novelty=1.0 staleness=0.0 similarity_gap=None
news_signal
impact
4.0
10.0
40.0%
gap_magnitude=small
news_signal
relevance
5.0
5.0
100.0%
asset=NVDA category=semiconductor_supply_chain
news_signal
certainty
2.5
5.0
50.0%
gap_direction=neutral hint=unknown
volume_price
volume
0.0
10.0
0.0%
volume_ratio=0.01
volume_price
price_change
5.0
10.0
50.0%
trend=1.0 confirm=0.0bps
volume_price
order_flow
1.1
5.0
21.1%
microstructure=0.211 tick_imbalance=0.383 trade_count_ratio=0.0
key_factors
factor_coverage
10.0
10.0
100.0%
6 mapped metrics
key_factors
revision_magnitude
0.0
10.0
0.0%
avg revision 0.0%
timeliness
fetch_latency
5.0
5.0
100.0%
poll-interval estimate: 10s
timeliness
priced_in
5.0
5.0
100.0%
priced_in=0.0 pre_drift=0.0bps
risk_and_other
liquidity
5.0
5.0
100.0%
liquidity_ok=True
risk_and_other
cross_verification
5.0
5.0
100.0%
factor=neutral vs price=down
Total / neutral
—
60.6
100.0
60.6%
—
10. Audit Notes
Every reusable numeric field from the narrative report is included above.
Parameter names are restricted to the asset-specific registry.
Model weights sum to 100%; all model contributions are retained.
Historical efficiency uses a bounded median to reduce outlier influence.
Direction codes are +1 for up, 0 for flat/unavailable, and -1 for down.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational
purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer
to buy or sell any security. Content is generated by an automated research framework
using public information and quantitative models; all predictions are probabilistic
estimates, not guarantees. Past or backtested performance does not guarantee future
results. The framework holds no positions in any asset discussed and has no conflicts
of interest (EU MAR Article 20 disclosure). Trading involves substantial risk of loss.
Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions. News
screenshots are used solely for commentary and attribution; all trademarks belong to
their respective owners.
Top comments (0)