Asbestos Litigation
Each asbestos case is unique, but the general procedure to defend against such claims is similar. Your lawyer will need to take a deposition of the plaintiff.
A person's exposure to asbestos can come from multiple sources, not just one employer or company. This is the reason asbestos cases usually involve multiple defendants.
Find out the source of exposure
Recognizing asbestos exposure is an important step in submitting an asbestos claim. Lawyers representing victims typically make use of medical records to determine asbestos' source. This could help victims receive compensation from the companies accountable for asbestos exposure.
Compensation is required by mesothelioma patients as well as their families to pay for the cost of expensive treatment. Compensation can also help families cope with the emotional burden of a mesothelioma diagnosis.
Asbestos lawsuits are complicated legal cases, and victims need to understand their rights and the way in which the process operates. While attorneys can handle many aspects of a case, the plaintiffs are expected to take part in the case too. This includes responding promptly to requests for discovery and attending depositions in court.
It is also crucial to keep in mind that the statutes of limitations in New York are limited, and it is important to speak with an experienced asbestos attorney whenever you can. Failing to file a claim within the appropriate timeframe could result in the loss on financial compensation.
In some instances, asbestos products made by multiple companies have been used to expose victims. In these cases, lawyers representing the victims will be required to identify all asbestos-containing products as well as the employers and contractors who supplied the materials.
Asbestos litigation is the longest-running mass tort in American history. It has been responsible for dozens of bankruptcy filings by asbestos producers. Many of these companies set up trust funds for asbestos victims. Despite this asbestos defendants continue to deny the evidence linking asbestos exposure to mesothelioma or lung cancer. This is despite the research of doctors such as Dr. Irving J. Selikoff and Dr. Jacob Churg.
The process of creating an Database
A lawsuit involving asbestos-related diseases or mesothelioma differs from a typical personal injury case. In many cases asbestos litigation, there are a lot of the same defendants (companies that are sued) and many of the same law firms that represent plaintiffs, and a lot of the same expert witnesses.
To build a viable defense in a case involving asbestos, attorneys must have access to a vast database that can pinpoint potential sources of exposure. This involves reviewing the job site, talking to coworkers and obtaining documents from employers and suppliers. This process involves locating and interviewing doctors or nurses who may be able to be able to testify about asbestos exposure.
Making this kind of database can be a challenge particularly in situations where the data was lost or destroyed over the course of time. If this happens it could require the reconstruction of a complete claims database and insurance program, often from a variety of sources, including loss runs, claim files, internal systems, and defense counsel records. Duluth asbestos attorneys can take years, or even decades, to complete.
Asbestos lawyers should also have access to a program that allows them to find potential exposure sites and to identify potential defendants. Lawyers can save time and money by having this information at their fingertips.
After the collapse of several asbestos producers, plaintiffs' attorneys sought out new defendants for their lawsuits. In the end asbestos cases in West Virginia have become defined by tri-annual consolidated trial groups where volume reigns supreme and suits naming fewer than 100 defendants are a rarity.
Identifying Defendants
The majority of asbestos lawsuits are based by factual evidence that's later discovered. Many asbestos companies resisted for many years that their products could harm people, but when lawsuits began, company documents were discovered to provide evidence of the dangers. These documents can be used to prove that particular products of the defendant caused injuries. To win a lawsuit, a plaintiff has to prove that the defendant's products were used in his work place, that he breathed in dust from the product and that this exposure was a major factor in his injuries.
Since asbestos cases involve multiple defendants, the process of identifying defendants is different from the typical personal injury case. By interviewing coworkers and family members, examining invoices and work orders, obtaining documents from vendors and suppliers and analyzing asbestos samples collected from the plaintiff's work place and home, it is possible to establish an information database that connects employers locations, workplaces, and products. The type of asbestos involved - amosite, chrysotile, or crocidolite - is useful in identifying defendants since each product is manufactured by a different manufacturer.
Defendants are required to carefully examine these facts and determine the possible sources of exposure. This could include a thorough review of more than 40 years of records from the Social Security, tax, union, and other documents of a worker. Due to the lengthy latency of asbestos-related injuries, it's difficult and costly to create an accurate database.
Due to the huge number of cases and the insufficient resources of defendants Many asbestos cases are referred to multi-district litigation (MDL) in federal courts. This allows defendants to share resources and prevent duplication of discovery.
Case Development
Asbestos lawsuits involve extensive research and the review of a large number of documents. This can be a difficult job, as asbestos exposure is often a long time before a person is diagnosed with a disease. In order to identify the source of exposure, lawyers need to conduct interviews and look over hundreds of pages of documentation such as employment records, union documents, tax and social security files and medical and laboratory reports.
The lawyers representing the plaintiffs must do all they can to identify other defendants. In some cases, there can be as high as 40 defendants. To accomplish this, they have to examine the supply chain to find entities that may have a nexus with asbestos, but aren't named in the lawsuit.
This process is lengthy, especially when the plaintiff suffers from mesothelioma or other serious illnesses. In addition, it can be often difficult to find witnesses and to obtain physical evidence.
A mesothelioma attorney will work to identify all defendants and their connections to the victim's exposure. This could be accomplished by a thorough analysis of over 40 years of the victim's history through interviews, as well as a look at their social security, union, labor and tax records.
A successful asbestos litigation strategy requires extensive experience in this tangled area of law. At McGivney, Kluger, Clark & Intoccia We have been at the forefront of asbestos litigation since our inception back in 1994. We are the nationally recognized as leaders in the defense of firms involved in industry-wide, multi-jurisdictional litigation. We are the National Coordinating Counsel, and liaison counsel. We represent and represent the interests of a wide range of defendants, including distributors, manufacturers, and contractors. We have extensive experience in creating and implementing key defenses including expert testimony, jurisdictional Case Management Orders.
Prepare for trial
Lawyers need to carefully prepare their cases ahead of trial so that their clients have the strongest arguments and evidence possible. This involves reviewing medical records, making sure that all witnesses are prepared and identifying evidence to be used in the case. This process can be several years in the case of complex cases.
Many asbestos sufferers develop a less severe disease such as asbestosis, fibrous or pleural plaques prior to the mesothelioma's development. Asbestosis symptoms include tightening of the lungs that could cause breathing problems, coughing, chest pain and so on.
Asbestos victims' attorneys must also examine the evidence to determine any potential defendants that could be held responsible for the asbestos injuries. This may involve interviewing coworkers and family members, asbestos asbestos manufacturers, asbestos abatement employees and obtaining various documents.
After a lawyer has identified a defendant, they must then determine the liability of the party. The defendants can be businesses, individuals, or government agencies. They must be held accountable for their negligent actions.
Several legislative remedies to resolve asbestos litigation have been formulated in Congress. These efforts have not been successful due to a range of complicated political issues. Asbestos victims along with their lawyers and government remain determined to hold asbestos companies accountable for their behavior.
The law firm of Waters Kraus & Paul has handled hundreds of cases in New York state and across the country. Our lawyers have held asbestos producers as well as insurance companies and other responsible parties accountable. In Upstate New York asbestos litigation is divided into five judicial districts, where cases are supervised by judges with experience in asbestos matters.
The Asbestos Litigation Group welcomes all AAJ members, including regular, life sustainer, President's club members. Members of the Asbestos Litigation Group network and discuss legal issues, strategies, and at annual and Winter conventions.
Duluth asbestos attorneys
Top comments (0)