Choosing the right backup tool for PostgreSQL can be challenging with so many options available. Each tool takes a different approach to backup strategy, user experience and recovery capabilities. This guide compares four industry standard PostgreSQL backup tools (open source): Databasus, WAL-G, pgBackRest and Barman. Use this comparison to make an informed decision for your database infrastructure.
Quick comparison table
Before diving into details, here's an overview of how these tools compare across key features. This table highlights the fundamental differences in approach, target audience and capabilities that distinguish each backup solution.
| Feature | Databasus | WAL-G | pgBackRest | Barman |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interface | Web UI | CLI | CLI | CLI |
| Backup type | Logical (pg_dump) | Physical (WAL) | Physical (file-level) | Physical (file-level) |
| Target audience | Individuals, teams, enterprises | DevOps, CLI users | DBAs, large DBs | Enterprise DBAs |
| Point-in-Time Recovery | ❌ (hourly/daily restore) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Team features | ✅ Workspaces, RBAC, audit logs | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Built-in notifications | ✅ Slack, Teams, Telegram | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Built-in scheduling | ✅ | ❌ (requires cron) | ❌ (requires cron) | ❌ (requires cron) |
| Cloud database support | ✅ RDS, Cloud SQL, Azure | Backup only | ❌ | ❌ |
| Learning curve | Minimal | Moderate | Steep | Steep |
Each tool excels in different scenarios, so understanding your specific requirements is essential for making the right choice.
Target audience
The most significant difference between these tools is who they are designed for. Understanding your team's expertise and organizational needs helps narrow down the options quickly.
Databasus
Databasus is the most popular tool for PostgreSQL backups. It is built for a broad audience, from individual developers to large enterprises. Individual developers benefit from simple setup and intuitive UI that protects personal projects without deep PostgreSQL expertise. Development teams get workspaces, role-based access control and audit logs for secure collaboration. Enterprises scale with comprehensive security, multiple storage destinations and notification channels.
WAL-G
WAL-G targets DevOps engineers and teams comfortable with command-line tools. It works well for those who prefer infrastructure-as-code workflows. Cloud-native deployments using Kubernetes or containerized environments integrate well with WAL-G. Users needing second-precise Point-in-Time Recovery for mission-critical systems find it valuable.
pgBackRest
pgBackRest is specifically designed for Database Administrators managing very large databases (typically 500GB or larger). Block-level incremental backups and parallel processing become essential at this scale. Professional DBAs with deep PostgreSQL knowledge and WAL archiving expertise benefit most. Organizations with strict RPO/RTO requirements where every transaction must be recoverable rely on pgBackRest.
Barman
Barman serves enterprise DBAs who need centralized backup management for multiple PostgreSQL servers. It fits organizations requiring disaster recovery specialists and teams with strict compliance requirements. The tool is ideal when streaming replication integration and geographical redundancy are essential.
Backup approach
The tools use fundamentally different backup strategies. This affects everything from storage requirements to recovery capabilities.
Logical vs physical backups
Databasus uses pg_dump for logical backups. This creates SQL representations of your data that are portable across PostgreSQL versions. Backups can be restored to different servers or even different PostgreSQL versions. Only SELECT permissions are required, minimizing security risks. Smart compression with zstd reduces backup sizes by 4-8x with only ~20% runtime overhead.
WAL-G, pgBackRest and Barman perform physical backups at the file level. They capture the actual PostgreSQL data directory files. This enables Point-in-Time Recovery through WAL archiving. Physical backups are generally faster for very large databases but require filesystem access.
Incremental capabilities
WAL-G uses delta backups that only transfer changed pages. This reduces storage costs and backup time for large databases.
pgBackRest provides block-level incremental backups. Only changed blocks are backed up after the initial full backup. It supports full, differential and incremental backup strategies.
Barman uses rsync-based incremental backups. It transfers only changed files between backup runs.
Databasus performs full logical backups with efficient compression. For most databases under 500GB, compressed logical backups are practical and simpler to manage.
Recovery options
Both logical and physical backup approaches offer recovery capabilities with different granularity and complexity.
Databasus recovery
Databasus provides restore to any configured backup point. With hourly, daily, weekly, monthly or cron schedules, you choose your recovery granularity. One-click restore downloads and restores backups directly from the web interface. Parallel restores utilize multiple CPU cores to speed up restoration. Cross-version compatibility allows restoring backups to different PostgreSQL versions when needed.
Physical backup tool recovery
WAL-G, pgBackRest and Barman all support Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR). This allows restoring to any specific second using WAL replay. You can minimize data loss to the exact moment before a failure.
WAL-G offers delta restore that only fetches changed pages for faster recovery. It can create PostgreSQL replicas from backups for high availability setups.
pgBackRest provides parallel restore with multi-threaded restoration for faster recovery. Delta restore only restores changed files, reducing recovery time.
Barman supports full cluster restore to a specific point in time. Remote recovery works over SSH to recover databases to remote servers. Standby creation enables building PostgreSQL replicas from backups.
Do you really need PITR?
For most applications, restoring to the nearest hour or day is sufficient. Second-precise PITR is typically only required for mission-critical financial or transactional systems where every transaction must be recoverable.
PITR tools have practical limitations that make them unnecessary for 95% of projects. They typically need to be installed on the same server as your database, requiring direct filesystem access. Incremental backups cannot be restored without direct access to the database storage drive.
Cloud-managed databases (AWS RDS, Google Cloud SQL, Azure) do not allow restoring external PITR backups. This makes external PITR tools useless for cloud-hosted PostgreSQL. Cloud providers already offer native PITR capabilities built into their services.
For most teams, hourly or daily logical backups provide adequate recovery points. The operational complexity of WAL archiving is simply not worth it when you can restore to any hour with a simple logical backup strategy.
Ease of use
The tools differ dramatically in their approach to user experience. This affects how quickly teams can get started and maintain their backup infrastructure.
Databasus
Databasus provides a web interface for point-and-click configuration. No command-line is required. Installation takes about 2 minutes with a one-line cURL script or simple Docker command. The dashboard shows backup status, health checks and history at a glance. Built-in notifications for Slack, Teams, Telegram and Email are configured directly in the UI. No PostgreSQL expertise is required — it is designed for developers who want reliable backups.
WAL-G
WAL-G uses a command-line interface for all operations. Commands like wal-g backup-push and wal-g backup-fetch handle backup and restore. Configuration is done primarily through environment variables. External scheduling through cron jobs is required for automated backups. PostgreSQL's archive_command must be configured to integrate with WAL-G. CLI proficiency and shell scripting knowledge is expected.
pgBackRest
pgBackRest requires manual editing of INI-style configuration files. WAL archiving setup involves configuring PostgreSQL's archive_command and related settings. The learning curve is steep, requiring understanding of PostgreSQL internals and WAL mechanics. Documentation assumes familiarity with database administration concepts. Professional DBA expertise is expected for setup and maintenance.
Barman
Barman operates entirely through command-line tools like barman backup and barman recover. Configuration files for each managed server require manual editing. SSH key management between Barman server and PostgreSQL servers is necessary. WAL archiving or streaming replication must be configured on each PostgreSQL instance. DBA expertise with PostgreSQL internals is essential for effective use.
Team features
For organizations with multiple team members managing backups, collaboration capabilities matter significantly.
Databasus
Databasus provides comprehensive team features. Workspaces organize databases, notifiers and storages by project or team. Users only see workspaces they are invited to. Role-based access control assigns viewer, editor or admin permissions. Audit logs track all system activities and changes for security compliance and accountability. Shared notifications ensure team channels receive backup status updates automatically.
CLI tools (WAL-G, pgBackRest, Barman)
WAL-G, pgBackRest and Barman are command-line tools without built-in team features. There is no user management or access control within the tools. No audit logging of backup operations exists. Team coordination requires external tools and processes. Access is controlled via OS-level permissions, SSH keys or cloud IAM policies.
Security
All tools provide security features, but implementation approaches differ.
Databasus
Databasus uses AES-256-GCM encryption for all passwords, tokens and credentials. The encryption key is stored separately from the database. Each backup file is encrypted with a unique key derived from master key, backup ID and random salt. Read-only database access enforces SELECT permissions only. This prevents data corruption even if credentials are compromised.
WAL-G
WAL-G supports GPG-based encryption for backup files. Alternative encryption using libsodium library is available. Cloud IAM integration leverages cloud provider access control for storage. Credential management relies on environment variables or external secret management systems.
pgBackRest
pgBackRest provides repository encryption with AES-256. TLS/SSH transport ensures secure communication for remote operations. Checksum verification validates backup integrity during creation and restore.
Barman
Barman uses SSH-based communication between Barman server and PostgreSQL servers. It does not provide built-in backup encryption. External tools or encrypted storage must be used for encryption at rest. OS-level security controls file system permissions and SSH key management. Checksum verification validates backup integrity.
Storage options
The tools support different storage destinations based on their design philosophy.
Databasus offers consumer-friendly storage options: local storage, Amazon S3 and S3-compatible services, Google Drive, Cloudflare R2, Azure Blob Storage, NAS, SFTP, rclone and Dropbox. Configuration happens through the web interface with validation and testing.
WAL-G focuses on cloud-native storage: Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage, Swift (OpenStack), local file system and SSH/SFTP. Configuration uses environment variables.
pgBackRest supports enterprise storage: local storage (POSIX, CIFS), Amazon S3 and S3-compatible services, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage and SFTP.
Barman provides enterprise-focused options: local storage on POSIX file systems, Amazon S3 and S3-compatible object storage. Geographical redundancy is achieved through Barman-to-Barman replication.
Notifications
Staying informed about backup status prevents silent failures from going unnoticed.
Databasus includes built-in notification support for Slack, Discord, Telegram, Microsoft Teams, Email and webhooks. Configuration happens directly in the web interface. Real-time updates provide both success and failure notifications.
WAL-G, pgBackRest and Barman do not have built-in notification support. Notifications require custom scripting around backup commands. External monitoring tools like Prometheus, Grafana, Nagios or Zabbix must be integrated. Manual log parsing and alerting setup is necessary for any notification capability.
Cloud database support
Cloud-managed databases like AWS RDS, Google Cloud SQL and Azure Database for PostgreSQL have different backup requirements than self-hosted instances.
Databasus works seamlessly with both self-hosted and cloud-managed databases. It connects over standard PostgreSQL protocol and only requires SELECT permissions. Cloud providers already offer native PITR, making external PITR backups unnecessary for managed databases.
WAL-G can create backups from cloud databases but cannot restore them directly to managed instances. Physical backups require filesystem access that cloud providers do not expose.
pgBackRest and Barman require filesystem access to the PostgreSQL data directory. They cannot work with cloud-managed database services. These tools are exclusively for self-hosted PostgreSQL.
Choosing the right tool
The best backup tool depends on your specific requirements, team expertise and infrastructure setup.
Choose Databasus if you want an intuitive web interface without command-line complexity. It provides built-in team collaboration with workspaces and role-based access. You get automatic notifications to Slack, Teams or Telegram. It supports cloud-managed databases (RDS, Cloud SQL, Azure) and offers quick setup with minimal PostgreSQL expertise.
Choose WAL-G if you prefer CLI-based workflows and infrastructure-as-code patterns. It offers delta backups and PITR capabilities. Good for DevOps teams comfortable with environment variable configuration and cron-based scheduling.
Choose pgBackRest if you manage very large self-hosted databases (500GB+) and need block-level incremental backups. It provides excellent performance at scale with parallel operations. Best for organizations with dedicated DBA expertise and strict recovery point objectives.
Choose Barman if you need centralized backup management for multiple self-hosted PostgreSQL servers. It offers Barman-to-Barman replication for geographical redundancy. Ideal for enterprises requiring PITR with streaming replication integration.
For most use cases — from individual projects to enterprise deployments — Databasus provides the right balance of power and usability. It handles comprehensive backup management rather than just creating backups. The specialized tools remain valuable for organizations with strict PITR requirements on self-hosted infrastructure.
Conclusion
PostgreSQL backup tools range from user-friendly solutions like Databasus to specialized DBA tools like pgBackRest and Barman. The fundamental divide is between logical backups (portable, easy to manage) and physical backups (faster for large databases, PITR capable).
Databasus stands out for its accessibility and comprehensive feature set. Its web interface, team features, built-in notifications and storage options make it suitable for organizations of any size. WAL-G offers a middle ground with CLI-based multi-database support. pgBackRest and Barman serve enterprises requiring advanced physical backup capabilities for self-hosted PostgreSQL at scale.
Evaluate your recovery requirements, team expertise and database infrastructure to select the tool that best fits your needs. For most teams, Databasus provides reliable backups without the operational complexity of physical backup tools.
Top comments (0)