There is some credit to your answer, but I suspect you under estimate the thing quite a lot, especially considering its motion, trajectory and momentum ...
In my ~15 years of software development, I have realized that it's just too complicated to instruct a processor to communicate with a human properly.
So I reckon that, if it's so difficult to make software that works well, without spending a lot of resources, it's not going to be that easy to have software create software for you for free (meaning human resources free not $$ per se)
Anyway, when that day comes, I think all humans are going to be happier, since a lot of our problems are going to be resolved.
it's just too complicated to instruct a processor to communicate with a human properly
This is why you use deep learning and not "instructions". According to a study on ChatGPT4, it not only provides 18% more accurate diagnostic services than the average GP, but it also scores 30% better on empathy ...
You've got one point though, which is that there will always be needed a smart human being capable of telling the machine what it wants for the machine to do - Which implies smart people (people like us), will (probably) always be sought after, to solve hard problems, using AI as cognitive assistants though I suspect ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
There is some credit to your answer, but I suspect you under estimate the thing quite a lot, especially considering its motion, trajectory and momentum ...
In my ~15 years of software development, I have realized that it's just too complicated to instruct a processor to communicate with a human properly.
So I reckon that, if it's so difficult to make software that works well, without spending a lot of resources, it's not going to be that easy to have software create software for you for free (meaning human resources free not $$ per se)
Anyway, when that day comes, I think all humans are going to be happier, since a lot of our problems are going to be resolved.
This is why you use deep learning and not "instructions". According to a study on ChatGPT4, it not only provides 18% more accurate diagnostic services than the average GP, but it also scores 30% better on empathy ...
You've got one point though, which is that there will always be needed a smart human being capable of telling the machine what it wants for the machine to do - Which implies smart people (people like us), will (probably) always be sought after, to solve hard problems, using AI as cognitive assistants though I suspect ...