Actually, I feel like a lot of people would applaud the typedef rule in this situation (yes, I deleted the types from the implementation):
typedef
const myArrowFunction: (arg1: number, arg2: number) => void = (arg1, arg2) => { // ... }
This way all the type information comes first, and the implementation comes after. Very haskelly.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Actually, I feel like a lot of people would applaud the
typedef
rule in this situation (yes, I deleted the types from the implementation):This way all the type information comes first, and the implementation comes after.
Very haskelly.