DEV Community

Cover image for How to properly use passwords

How to properly use passwords

Nathanael Demacon on November 12, 2018

There are different kind of passwords uses: the "my memory isn't that good" (also call the "I don't care anymore" method) with passwords like qw...
Collapse
 
tailcall profile image
Maria Zaitseva

I tend to use a lot of passwords inspired by xkcd.com/936/
I usually mix in a couple of nonsense words in them for more security (in case there's a password cracking program that's aware of xkcd 936)

Collapse
 
quantumsheep profile image
Nathanael Demacon • Edited

I didn't know xkcd, thanks for sharing this! Random words are very nice, longer means stronger ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Collapse
 
siwon profile image
Simon

Sorry I am late, but this technique reminds me of another one, very similar : Diceware which looks like a very strong password generator as well !

Thread Thread
 
tailcall profile image
Maria Zaitseva

Hi Simon, thanks for sharing! I like this one much more as it appears to be well studied.

Collapse
 
kspeakman profile image
Kasey Speakman • Edited

To add on to your suggestion, it is good practice to use different passwords for every website. Because not all sites treat passwords with equal security. If you use the same password everywhere, that random forum you signed up for 3 years ago might be pretty easy to hack, and therefore it will expose the same email/password you use for FB.

So, I have a strategy for varying passwords between websites that doesn't require a memory palace. I use a complex base password like the post above describes. But I add some characters to the password that are specific to the website. For example, for a bank website, you might choose ba (the first 2 letters in bank) as your extra letters. You take your base password and add the extra letters to the front, middle, end, or some combination of positions. You can choose your extra letters from the kind of thing it is, or the name of the site, or just the first thing you think of for that site. Whatever your strategy, you only have to remember 2 bits of information: your base password and your extra letter formula. Then anytime you go to a site you can mentally calculate what the password should be.

The placement of the letters (front, mid, back, etc) gives some variance for when sites force you to change passwords. Then you use the same letters, but put them in a different place. If you come back to the site sometime later and are having trouble logging in, you can try a different letter placements.

Collapse
 
quantumsheep profile image
Nathanael Demacon

I didn't mention that the use of different passwords for each website is recommended, nice to mention it!

Your method is a nice way to handle multiple websites issue, like for dev.to it will be Dv or something like that.

Collapse
 
scottishross profile image
Ross Henderson • Edited

Current guidelines suggest not having a new password for each website, as you can forget it and through frustration remove all safety precautions.

A better solution would be to have 3 interchangeable characters and use the website names shorthand for it. I.e:

If you have a password like fg24f!hyn%
Add 3 letters for what website: fg24f!HYn%fac (Facebook), fg24f!HYn%twt (Twitter), fg24f!HYn%gth (GitHub).

That way you have learned a master password, and then just remember what website you're trying to log in to... Which hopefully isn't difficult!

Thread Thread
 
kspeakman profile image
Kasey Speakman

Thanks. Yeah, that's exactly what I was getting at.

Collapse
 
artis3n profile image
Ari Kalfus

Thanks for this article! I want to challenge/comment on a few of your statements, however. The web browser's password store gets you 60% of the way to "great" security. For most of the internet, getting them to use unique passwords generated, stored, and synced via their browser is a huge win. I would absolutely recommend browser password stores for the majority of people. It's the biggest win (60% of the way there) with the smallest change to user behavior. I agree that someone with access to the local filesystem can read those passwords in plaintext. That gets protected in the last 40%. For the vast majority of people on the internet, that's an OK accepted risk. For the readership of dev.to, I think your statement works because we're all super technical and ready to add a little complexity to make sure we're doing the right thing. (we all unit test, right?!)

Password managers are awesome and I would love if everyone used them. That gets you another 10% of the way to "great" security. I would include Lastpass and 1Password alongside Dashlane, as I believe those two have a larger market share. Going with the biggest password manager generally means you're going to go with the company with the most eyes on them and security issues will get fixed much more quickly. Lastpass's turnaround for notification, remediation, and publication to production is generally a couple hours. It's pretty incredible. I use a different open-source password manager but gotta give them credit where it's due.

In terms of your password creation recommendations, using a sentence you know to generate a passphrase is awesome. Although, last year NIST rolled back their recommendations that you need a bunch of numbers and symbols in your password. They've admitted their guy basically made up those rules and they heavily inconvenience users trying to remember them. That part I don't believe is in the report but said in an interview. The full publication is here, although it's dull so it's easier to read Auth0's summary of the report here. TLDR; if you have to remember a password, use a long passphrase made up of a sentence you will remember (from your favorite book or something). If you don't, let your password manager or browser generate a long one for you.

The last 30% of great security comes from setting up 2FA but that's not strictly password security so it's fine to leave out in a post like this. Including here so you get where the nice 100% comes from, in my mind.

Collapse
 
quantumsheep profile image
Nathanael Demacon

I couldn't hope for a better comment 😮

You made a counter argument in your first paragraph, if only accessing your file system can lead to a theft of data then it's not safe at all. While browsers don't really protect your passwords because of a lack of master keys, password managers does that very well. But remember that some self-hosted password managers are stored locally, that means that it can be taken and deciphered (depending on your master key).

Auto-generated passwords can be really bad when it's generated from a website or a platform that has internet connection. They can store them in their database, so your password could not be really safe. On the other hand, it's safe to generate it locally.

By the way, every passwords can be taken by phishing (2FA inclued).

Collapse
 
michaeltd profile image
michaeltd

A quick and dirty solution to complex passwords:

echo "input random stuff here"| sha512sum
Collapse
 
dimensi0n profile image
Erwan ROUSSEL

One more time, a wonderful post.