DEV Community

Rakshanda Abhimaan
Rakshanda Abhimaan

Posted on • Originally published at sortsites.com

Competitor Template Checklist: Build One That Actually Decides

#projectmanager #projectmanagement #softwareengineering #agile

competitor research template comparing brands in simple table

Full guide + resources.

Most competitor templates fail for a simple reason:

They collect data.
They don’t drive decisions.

This guide fixes that.

You’ll get:

  • a minimal working structure
  • a strict checklist
  • a usable template
  • common mistakes + fixes

No theory. Just execution.

What a usable competitor template must do

Before building anything, define success.

A competitor research template must answer:

  • Who is strongest?
  • Where is the gap?
  • What should we do next?

If it can’t answer these → it’s broken.

Step-by-step: create competitor template (execution version)

Step 1: Limit competitors 

Use 3–7 competitors max
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Rules:

  • only direct competitors
  • same problem, same user

Avoid:

  • indirect tools
  • big unrelated brands

Step 2: Define decision fields

Use only fields that affect decisions.

Required fields:
- price
- core feature
- positioning
- visibility
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Optional (only if needed):

  • target audience
  • integration depth
  • performance

If a field doesn’t change a decision → remove it.

Step 3: Build the table

Use a simple structure.

| Competitor | Price | Core Feature | Positioning | Visibility |
|------------|-------|-------------|-------------|-----------|
| Tool A     | Low   | Easy setup  | Beginner    | High      |
| Tool B     | Mid   | Flexibility | Advanced    | Medium    |
| Tool C     | High  | Enterprise  | Large teams | Low       |
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Rules:

  • one value per cell
  • no long text
  • no notes inside table

Step 4: Add AI competitor visibility (critical)

This is where most templates fail.

You must track:

- citation share (mentions in AI answers)
- summary presence (appears in search summaries)
- zero-click visibility (seen without clicks)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In simple words:

Track who shows up when users ask questions.

Not just rankings.
Not just features.

Step 5: Extract decisions (mandatory)

Filling the table is not enough.

Add a decision layer:

Mark:
- strongest competitor
- weakest competitor
- gap in the market
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Example:

Tool B:
- not cheapest
- not simplest
- highest visibility

=> likely dominant
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Minimal competitor template (copy this)

Use this exact format.

SECTION 1: Competitors
- Tool A
- Tool B
- Tool C

SECTION 2: Comparison
| Competitor | Price | Feature | Positioning | AI Visibility |

SECTION 3: Insights
- who dominates visibility
- who competes on price
- who owns niche

SECTION 4: Actions
- what to copy
- what to avoid
- what gap to target
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Checklist before using your template

Core checklist

  • [ ] 3–7 competitors only
  • [ ] direct competitors only
  • [ ] simple table structure
  • [ ] one value per cell
  • [ ] no unnecessary fields

AI visibility checklist

  • [ ] AI mentions tracked
  • [ ] search summaries tracked
  • [ ] zero-click presence tracked

Decision checklist

  • [ ] strongest competitor identified
  • [ ] weakest competitor identified
  • [ ] clear gap defined
  • [ ] next action written

Using competitor tracking tools (practical setup)

You don’t need complex systems.

Manual tracking 

1. search key queries
2. note which competitors appear
3. record frequency
4. update weekly
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Good for:

  • small teams
  • early stage

Automated competitor tracking tools

Use when scale increases.

Track:

  • ranking changes
  • content updates
  • AI mentions

Workflow:

1. define competitor list
2. set queries
3. track weekly mentions
4. update template
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Common mistakes (and fixes)

Mistake 1: Too many columns

Problem:

  • hard to scan
  • no clarity

Fix:

remove anything not tied to decisions
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Mistake 2: No AI visibility tracking

Problem:

  • outdated analysis

Fix:

add visibility column immediately
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Mistake 3: Treating template as a report

Problem:

  • static
  • not updated

Fix:

update weekly or monthly
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Mistake 4: Tracking everything

Problem:

  • noise > insight

Fix:

track only decision fields
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Quick example 

| Competitor | Price | Feature        | Positioning     | AI Visibility |
|------------|-------|---------------|-----------------|--------------|
| Tool A     | Low   | Basic login   | Simple          | Low          |
| Tool B     | Mid   | Fast checkout | Performance     | High         |
| Tool C     | High  | Full suite    | Enterprise      | Medium       |
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Insights:

  • Tool B dominates visibility
  • Tool A competes on price
  • Tool C targets enterprise

Decision becomes obvious.

Final rule

Before using your template, ask:

Does this help decide what to do next?
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If not → remove it.

Next step

This post focused on execution:

  • structure
  • checklist
  • template

The full guide covers:

  • deeper examples
  • exact field definitions
  • AI visibility tracking in detail

👉Full guide here.

Top comments (0)