Most point-of-sale (POS) systems in restaurants are still designed around a single terminal mindset. Others swing too far in the opposite direction—cloud-only, fragile, and dependent on third-party integrations for even basic workflows.
While working on CounterFlowPOS, we set out to design a POS platform that treats reliability, data consistency, and extensibility as first-class concerns—while still enabling modern capabilities like online ordering and AI-driven promotions.
This post breaks down the technical architecture, design trade-offs, and lessons learned.
Problem Statement
From an engineering perspective, restaurant POS systems face a few non-negotiable constraints:
- They must work offline
- They must reconcile online and in-store data cleanly
- They must not fragment business logic across multiple vendors
- They must be extensible without constant rewrites
Most existing solutions fail at least one of these.
Architecture Overview
CounterFlowPOS is built around a single-backend, multi-client architecture.
High-Level Components
Clients
├── Windows WPF POS / Kiosk / Back Office
├── Next.js Web Store (Browser)
Backend
├── Node.js + Express (Single API Layer)
├── REST / JSON Contracts
Data
├── PostgreSQL (Single Shared Database)
Platform Services
├── Payments (Stripe)
├── AI Marketing Agents (Azure Foundry)
The guiding principle:
one source of truth, one API surface, multiple user experiences.
Offline-First: CounterFlowPOS Lite
Why Offline Still Matters
Despite cloud adoption, restaurants still experience:
- unreliable internet
- payment processor outages
- peak-hour congestion
A POS that fails during service is unacceptable.
Implementation Approach
CounterFlowPOS Lite is a standalone Windows application that:
- operates fully offline once registered
- persists orders, menus, and configuration locally
- does not require live API access to function
When connectivity is restored, the system can optionally sync data upstream.
This model intentionally avoids:
- background sync complexity
- conflict-heavy distributed state
- hidden dependencies on third-party services
Lite is optimized for predictability over feature sprawl.
Scaling Up: CounterFlowPOS Pro
CounterFlowPOS Pro extends the same domain model into a connected platform.
Clients
-
Windows WPF applications for:
- POS
- Kiosk
- Retail back-office
-
Next.js web app for:
- menu browsing
- shopping cart
- checkout
Backend API
A single Node.js / Express API exposes domain-driven routes:
All clients communicate via HTTP/REST + JSON.
No client-specific logic leaks into the backend.
Data Model: One Database, Shared Reality
The platform uses a single PostgreSQL database to store:
- products
- menus
- customers
- orders
- discounts
- promotions
This eliminates:
- sync jobs
- ETL pipelines
- duplicated schemas
- reconciliation bugs
Every client—POS, kiosk, or web—sees the same state.
AI-Driven Marketing: Multi-Agent Model
Instead of embedding AI directly into transactional flows, we treat marketing as an autonomous system layered on top of core data.
Why Multi-Agent?
Different marketing tasks have different constraints:
- promotion timing
- customer segmentation
- pricing sensitivity
- demand signals
Each agent is responsible for a narrow function:
- detecting slow periods
- recommending offers
- activating promotions
- measuring impact
Agents operate asynchronously and never block core order processing.
Platform Choice
AI services are deployed using Azure Foundry, allowing:
- isolation from transactional workloads
- controlled rollout
- clear audit boundaries
This keeps AI powerful but non-invasive.
Payment Architecture
Payments are intentionally decoupled from the POS core.
- Stripe is integrated at the API layer
- no hard dependency on a single merchant provider
- operators retain flexibility to switch processors
This avoids the vendor lock-in common in POS ecosystems.
Key Engineering Takeaways
- Offline-first simplifies more than it complicates
- A single API beats “microservices by default”
- Shared databases reduce operational risk when scoped correctly
- AI should assist, not interfere, with critical paths
- POS is infrastructure, not just UI
What’s Next
We’re continuing to:
- refine conflict-free sync strategies
- expand agent autonomy with tighter guardrails
- improve observability across POS and AI systems
Top comments (0)