DEV Community

Richard Smith
Richard Smith

Posted on

Why the Deep Questions Get Less Funding Than the Trivial Ones

I've been watching a show about a ranch in Utah where researchers investigate genuinely strange phenomena — things that don't fit neatly into our understanding of physics or reality. The lead researcher was puzzled by something specific: why aren't more billionaires funding this work?

It's a fair question. We live in an era where people have accumulated enough wealth to pursue almost anything, yet most of it flows toward familiar categories — social networks, delivery apps, crypto speculation. Meanwhile, questions about what reality actually is tend to get branded as fringe.

Skinwalker Ranch isn't asking "how do we monetize attention" or "what's the next billion-dollar market." It's asking whether our universe is more complicated than we've been told. That kind of inquiry doesn't have an obvious exit strategy.

I think part of the answer is that the people with resources tend to be people who succeed within systems. Questioning the systems — or exploring what lies beyond them — isn't the trait that got them there. Comfort with uncertainty doesn't scale.

But there's something uncomfortable about a world where we can fund ten thousand variations of the same app while genuinely strange observations sit largely unexplored.

What would change if more people with resources treated mystery as worthy of attention?

Top comments (0)