DEV Community

Rıdvan Tülünay (TulunaY)
Rıdvan Tülünay (TulunaY)

Posted on • Originally published at livchart.com

12 AI Models Tested: Which One Generates the Best Business Charts?

When you type "show me monthly revenue by region" into an AI dashboard tool, something complex happens behind the scenes.

The AI model must understand your business intent, identify the correct data columns, select an appropriate chart type, and generate valid configuration.

Different models handle these tasks very differently. Some get the chart type right but use wrong columns. Others understand the intent but produce invalid output.

We wanted real answers. So we tested 12 popular models across 32 real-world business scenarios.

What We Tested

We designed 32 test scenarios covering common business analytics requests:

  • Basic charts: Bar, line, pie, area for standard KPIs
  • Multi-dimensional analysis: Grouped comparisons, stacked charts
  • Time-series analysis: Trends over time, period comparisons
  • Conditional formatting: Thresholds, color rules
  • Multilingual prompts: Requests in Turkish and English
  • Complex queries: Multi-step analysis with follow-up questions

Each model was scored on correctness (right chart type and data mapping), completeness (all requested elements included), speed (response time), and stability (consistent results across similar prompts).

Speed Rankings

Response time matters for interactive use. If users wait more than 10 seconds, engagement drops.

Model CPU (no GPU) GPU / Apple Silicon
Gemma 4 E2B ~5s ~1.5s
Mistral 7B ~6s ~2s
Qwen 2.5 7B ~7s ~2s
Llama 3.1 8B ~8s ~2s
Qwen 3 8B ~10s ~3s

Gemma 4 E2B is clearly the fastest — ideal for interactive chart creation where speed matters more than the last few percent of accuracy.

Chart Accuracy (32 Scenarios)

Model Correct Wrong Partial
Llama 3.1 8B 28/32 2 2
Qwen 2.5 7B 27/32 3 2
Qwen 3 8B 26/32 3 3
Gemma 4 E2B 25/32 4 3
Mistral 7B 24/32 5 3

Llama 3.1 8B leads in accuracy. But the gap between top models is narrowing with each release.

Multilingual Performance

For teams working in multiple languages, this matters a lot.

Model Turkish Prompts English Prompts Overall
Qwen 2.5 7B 26/32 27/32 Best multilingual
Qwen 3 8B 25/32 26/32 Strong multilingual
Llama 3.1 8B 22/32 28/32 English-first
Gemma 4 E2B 20/32 25/32 Weaker Turkish
Mistral 7B 19/32 24/32 Weaker Turkish

Qwen models clearly dominate multilingual scenarios. If your team works in Turkish, Arabic, or other non-English languages, Qwen should be your first choice.

What We Learned About Chart Generation

Intent Detection Is Critical

"Show me revenue by region" could be a bar chart, pie chart, or treemap. The best models infer the most appropriate visualization type from context.

Structured Output Matters

Some models generate conversational text when chart configuration is expected. Others produce partial configurations that break rendering. This is the most common failure mode.

Edge Cases Cause Failures

Common patterns:

  • Misidentifying date columns as categorical data
  • Generating chart types that don't match data structure
  • Failing to handle empty or null values
  • Confusing similar column names

Better models handle these edge cases gracefully.

Consistency Across Sessions

Some models produce different charts for identical prompts across sessions. For production dashboard generation, consistency is essential.

Recommended Models by Use Case

Use Case Recommended Model Why
Turkish/multilingual dashboards Qwen 2.5 7B Best multilingual support
Fast interactive use Gemma 4 E2B Quickest response time
Maximum accuracy Llama 3.1 8B Highest chart correctness
Balanced performance Qwen 3 8B Good accuracy + multilingual
Lightweight deployment Mistral 7B Low hardware requirements

The Gap Is Narrowing

Models that struggled with chart generation six months ago now produce acceptable results. Within the next year, most mainstream models will handle business chart generation competently.

For now, selecting the right model for your specific use case still matters.


We built LivChart to make local AI dashboards accessible. Try different models and see which works best for your data.

Top comments (0)