DEV Community

Discussion on: Facade pattern in JavaScript

Collapse
 
saeedzandian profile image
Saeed • Edited

amazing! thanks for great article!
just out of curiosity, would it be nicer if we use symbol instead of string literals for different types?
and then instead of switch using strategy pattern using symbol as object key to select intended function

Collapse
 
tomekbuszewski profile image
Tomek Buszewski

You can use Symbol, example I've brought is purely illustrational. Or you can try TypeScript and use enums. Choose whatever you're most comfortable with, but remember to stick with it :)

Collapse
 
fabriziobertoglio1987 profile image
fabriziobertoglio1987 • Edited

in ruby would be .send(:"_findMusic", id), in JS _findMusic.call(this, id)?? or something similar??... thanks

Thread Thread
 
tomekbuszewski profile image
Tomek Buszewski

Hi fabriziobertoglio1987, can you rephrase your question? I don't seem to understand it fully :)

Thread Thread
 
fabriziobertoglio1987 profile image
fabriziobertoglio1987

I was referring to use either Symbol or other code like .call or other Object method to delete your switch statement and replace it with a loop

developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/W...

developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/W...

Thread Thread
 
tomekbuszewski profile image
Tomek Buszewski

Why would you obscure such a simple statement with a loop? It would be shorter, true, but more complex to the reader.

Thread Thread
 
fabriziobertoglio1987 profile image
fabriziobertoglio1987 • Edited

It is a common practive in Ruby. Right now would be done for exercise and experimentation, but it would make a lot of sense when you don't have only 1 switch statement and your code grows in complexity.

I don't like switch or if statements

keithcirkel.co.uk/metaprogramming-...

Thread Thread
 
tomekbuszewski profile image
Tomek Buszewski

I don't know about Ruby, but in fact some languages don't even have switch statements, for example, Python.

Creating a code that'll "know" which function to run without you telling it to with a direct statement is nice, but always try to think about some junior devs that might join your team. I had this phase of writing super complex code that only senior developers understood. But I quickly backed away, as I wasn't able to go on vacation, since I was the one person in the current team that understood how it all worked.

Thread Thread
 
fabriziobertoglio1987 profile image
fabriziobertoglio1987 • Edited

(But I quickly backed away, as I wasn't able to go on vacation, since I was the one person in the current team that understood how it all worked) :-D

Yes, I guess everything has its downside.

I think using metaprogramming sometimes is literally an alternative to using design patterns. For example the Factory Design Pattern allows you dinamically create objects, but you could solve the same problem with inheritance and metaprogramming

alligator.io/js/factory-pattern/

but the code would me much harder to read and does not make sense in Frontend Development.

The good thing is that Ecmascript now is really advanced and you are free to do anything with it. It is very good for Frontend, but also backend development.