DEV Community

Sam Turrell
Sam Turrell

Posted on • Originally published at samturrell.github.io on

Responsive Blocks and Vertical Alignment

Today I’m going to show you two of my favourite CSS “hacks.” Responsive height blocks, and vertical alignment. These two often go hand in hand, usually with some sort grid of blocks with text in the centre. I’m sure you’ve come across the pattern before.

Responsive blocks

First up, responsive blocks. We’ve all used responsive width columns, but you’ve probably never used responsive heights. If you apply height: 50%; to an element, you’re not going to see any results. Unlike width, height cannot be set as a percentage as block container elements do not not have a height, whereas they do default to 100% width.

We can, however, make the height relative to the width. To do so, we will be making use of the padding rule. If you apply the rule of padding-bottom: 100%; to a div, you will end up with a perfect square. However, a full page square isn’t exactly helpful is it. We want a grid of squares. You may think this is easy to a accomplish by setting a width on this div and watching it scale, however that is not the case. The padding is actually relative to the parent element, not the element with the rule applied.

So to make box smaller and responsively sized, we just need a container element with a width value. This is usually fine as it’s probably within a grid column anyway. Now you just tell the child how big it should be relative to the parent and there you have a perfect responsive height square.

<div style="margin: 0 -10px;" class="clearfix">
    <div style="width: 25%; float: left; padding: 0 10px;">
        <div class="primary" style="padding-bottom: 100%;"></div>
    </div>
    ...
</div>

You can of course do responsive rectangles by following the pattern and just adjusting the padding percentage.

Vertical Alignment

Ah, vertical alignment, the bane of frontend developers lives. However it doesn’t have to be. Depending on usage, you can follow a simple pattern to achieve vertical alignment that works extremely well with the above responsive blocks tip.

You’ll probably shudder at the thought, but we’re going to be using tables! Well, not exactly tables. Fake tables. Tables have the awesome ability of being able to make use of the vertical-align CSS rule for aligning content, and with the use of display: table; and display: table-cell; we can actually take advantage of this functionality with standard divs.

All you need is a div with display: table; and within it, a div with display: table-cell; and vertical-align: middle;. Just give the parent div a height and you’ll have perfectly entered content.

<div class="playground">
    <div class="primary" style="display: table; height: 100px; max-width: 100%; width: 100%; text-align: center;">
        <div style="display: table-cell; vertical-align: middle; padding: 15px;">
            Look at me being all vertically aligned!
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

Some may argue flexbox can solve this problem in much less lines of code, however table-cell is supported in every browser for a worry free dev experience.

The double whammy

Combining with the above is simple. If you try to put your faux-table inside the responsive block however, you’ll end up with a no longer reliably responsive block. This is because of the height from the padding trick combined with the height of your table. Instead we’ll need to add another container block within the responsive block.

Simply set position: relative; on the block with the padding, and add a new div within this with position: absolute; top: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; left: 0; which will make this div the same size as the parent which allow you to add content to the block.

This block also now has a fixed height, so you can now used a percentage height value for your content. Simply add your vertical aligned block to this div and give it a 100% height and width and you’ll have perfectly aligned content within your block.

Check out the original post to see these examples in action.

Latest comments (0)