# The CSS Calc Function

### Sarah Chima Dec 19 '17 γ»3 min read

I was quite excited when I first read an article on the CSS calc function.

For real, the ability to perform calculations in CSS with different units is definitely awesome. It's even more awesome when you actually make use of it practically. So in this article, we will learn about the CSS calc function and then get to a use case of this function. Let's get started right away.

**The CSS Calc Function**

The CSS calc function is used to perform calculations when specifying values of CSS properties. It can be used where any numerical value can be used. It takes an expression as its parameter and uses the result as the value of the CSS property where it is used. We can perform addition `+`

, subtraction `-`

, multiplication `*`

, and division `/`

with it. Cool right? Here's a simple example.

```
div {
width: calc(100% / 3);
}
```

So in the example above, the value of the width used is the result of the evaluation of `100%/3`

.

The exciting part of the `calc()`

function is the ability to mix units. That means you can perform calculations with different CSS units like viewport width(vw) and pixels(px) and still get valid results. This is where the CSS calc function sets itself apart from calculations done by preprocessors. Preprocessors cannot do this since it is done at render time. Let's play a little with this.

```
div {
height: calc(100% - 2em);
width: calc((100% - 20px) / 3);
}
```

You might not see how this works right now, but hold on, we'll get to a practical use soon. First, there are rules that should be followed when using the calc function. Let's consider them.

**The Rules **

When using multiplication, at least one of the arguments must be a number. When using division, the right-hand side must be a number. So,

`calc(100px * 20px)`

and`calc(700 / 40px)`

are invalid while`calc(100px * 20)`

and`calc(400px / 40)`

are valid.The addition and subtraction operators i.e.

`+`

and`-`

must be surrounded by whitespace. Therefore,`calc(100%-2rem)`

`calc(100%+ 2rem)`

, or`calc(100% -2rem)`

will not result to a valid value. The correct syntax is`calc(100% - 2rem)`

with whitespace before and after the operator.Division by zero results in an error.

Nesting calc functions is allowed. In that case, the nested functions are simply treated as parentheses.

**Browser Support**

The calc function has an amazing browser support all the way back to IE9. Visit Can I use to check out the details. If you write code for older browsers or Opera Mini, consider using a numerical value as a fallback.

Let's jump to one use of the calc function that's super cool.

**Responsive Typography**

Well, it's more like fluid typography and responsive typography. This is making your text appear well in any screen size without an extensive use of media queries. Recently, I had to work on a project where the text had to be responsive. Here's a formula I found useful.

```
font-size: calc(min font-size + font range * (100vw - min screen size)/ screen range);
```

where font range = max font-size - min font-size

and screen range = max screen size - min screen size.

Let's put this formula to work. We want a heading to be `24px`

on a screen with a width of 600px and `70px`

on a screen with a width of 1400px. So our font range is `70 - 24`

which is `46`

and our screen range is `1400 - 600`

which is `800`

. Putting all of these into the formula, we have:

```
h1 {
font-size: calc(24px + 46 * ((100vw - 600px) / 800));
}
```

Here's how it works.

Notice that the text gets really small as the screen gets smaller. This can be combined with media queries to make it look great on all screens. You can refer to this article for a detailed explanation of a variant of this formula and how it can work with media queries.

These are some articles on more use cases of the calc function.

A Couple of Use Cases for Calc()

Calc() by MDN.

How do you use the Calc function? I'll love to know. Please leave a comment.

Got any question or addition? Leave a comment.

Thank you for reading. :)

(open source and free forever β€οΈ)

I avoided calc for a long time until recently where it just made too much sense to use it, and I was kind of floored by how well supported it was. I've always avoided it because it seemed like one of those things that would need to be prefixed and wouldn't be supported in lots of browsers, but I was totally wrong.

ππ

I've been a huge fan of the CSS's calc() from time ago.

What I really miss is having units like vh but refering to the element's container instead of the whole viewport.

Sometimes I don't follow rules when working with calc() , I mix some Xvw with Ypx and it solves the problem I face in multiples devices view-port, I think Ihave to push myself sometimes to work with that rule , I mean flexbox, css grid and this powerful calc() , who needs bootstrap or any other css framework anymore? pure is better !

keep writing these great articles Sarah β₯

I'm getting used to not using a framework. CSS keeps getting better. Thank you for always reading my articles.ππ

it's always a pleasure :D

I recently used calc for the first time to dynamically calculate row heights in css grid.

It was actually my first time incorporating css grid, css variables, and the calc function, and it just came to me naturally as a solution. I stepped back and was like omg!

That's amazing. Thanks for sharing.

Woah. Thanks for posting this! Bookmarked, and going in my toolbox so fast! Definitely to be used with care, but when you really do need it, nothing else will do the same thing

nearlyso well.ππ

Great article!