Just two generics can do this
type SnakeToCamelCase<S extends string> = S extends `${infer T}_${infer U}` ? `${Lowercase<T>}${Capitalize<SnakeToCamelCase<U>>}` : S type SnakeToCamelCaseNested<T> = T extends object ? { [K in keyof T as SnakeToCamelCase<K & string>]: SnakeToCamelCaseNested<T[K]> } : T
In the time of writing this article lowercase and capitalise genericks did not exist.
I keep the article without changes because I wanted to demonstrate how to transform strings with low level features like rekursive iterations etc...
Iteration over keys with as keyword looks pretty handy! I have to chekt it! 😈
It's very nice generic! Thanks for sharing it !!!
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Just two generics can do this
In the time of writing this article lowercase and capitalise genericks did not exist.
I keep the article without changes because I wanted to demonstrate how to transform strings with low level features like rekursive iterations etc...
Iteration over keys with as keyword looks pretty handy! I have to chekt it! 😈
It's very nice generic! Thanks for sharing it !!!