When your title does not match your commit history, the parser and the human reviewer look at two different things. Parsers score the description body against the requirements, but humans check your history for consistency. A title that sounds impressive on paper fails the moment someone reads your actual log.
Six months doing the job is the real title, documented honestly. When you overstate your previous scope, you create a mismatch that survives automated screening only to fail during the manual check. Keep the designation plain and let the repository speak for itself.
One line of scope beats a fancier adjective. State what you owned, what you touched, and what you shipped. The people reading your application want to know your boundaries, not your marketing vocabulary.
Top comments (0)