DEV Community

Sofi Morilla
Sofi Morilla

Posted on

Building a Cosmetic Shop UX with Lamor (Admin Notes)

Lamor Field Test: Running a Beauty Store on WordPress

I’m writing this as a “field test” rather than a glossy theme tour, because cosmetic stores have a weird kind of pressure that most other ecommerce niches don’t. I recently launched a small-to-mid beauty shop for a client using Lamor – Beauty and Cosmetics Store WordPress Theme, and the build forced me to rethink a few assumptions I’d been carrying from more generic retail sites. A beauty store isn’t only about products; it’s about texture, trust, routine, and visual confidence. People don’t just buy a jar of cream—they buy the feeling that it fits their skin, their identity, and their daily ritual. That psychological layer changes how your homepage flows, how your category pages behave, and how your admin team has to manage content over time.

So this post is my practical, first-person admin report: what I installed, how I structured the catalog, where Lamor helped immediately, where I had to tighten discipline, and what I’d repeat on the next beauty build. I’ll keep it honest and operational. If you’re a site administrator for a cosmetics brand, skincare boutique, K-beauty seller, salon store, or a multi-category beauty marketplace, you should be able to use this as a blueprint—not just inspiration.

1. The launch problem beauty stores actually face

The beginning of this project looked simple on paper. The client had:

  • around 180 SKUs
  • 10 brand lines
  • 5 core categories (skincare, makeup, haircare, body, tools)
  • a monthly promo calendar
  • a modest influencer content pipeline
  • a plan to scale to 500 SKUs within a year

But the old site failed in three predictable ways:

  1. Discovery felt flat.
    Everyone landed on the homepage, scrolled, and left. The path from “interest” to “product fit” was unclear.

  2. Product pages were inconsistent.
    Different staff added specs in different formats. Some products had detailed routines, others were one sentence.

  3. Mobile browsing was frustrating.
    Beauty shoppers browse on phones while commuting or sitting in a salon chair. The old layout buried filters and made it hard to compare shades or variants.

As an admin, I saw the deeper issue: the site was built like a generic store, but beauty needs a routine-driven structure. People want to answer questions such as:

  • Is this for my skin type?
  • How do I use it with other products?
  • What’s the texture and finish?
  • Is it safe?
  • Do other people get results?

A theme has to support those questions without you hand-coding templates for every product line. Lamor’s biggest advantage is that it expects you to run a beauty catalog, not a random retail shelf.

2. Why I picked a niche theme over a generic foundation

I often browse wide catalogs like Multipurpose Themes when the project is flexible or the brand is still experimenting with direction. But in cosmetics, the “generic” option usually becomes expensive later, because you end up rebuilding the shop logic in plugins and custom blocks.

Beauty ecommerce has niche expectations:

  • product bundles and routines
  • shade/variant discovery
  • ingredient and safety credibility
  • editorial product storytelling
  • a strong “compare and filter” posture
  • seasonal and trend-based merchandising

Lamor’s layouts already assume those needs. That doesn’t mean it will automatically sell for you—no theme does—but it removes an enormous amount of structural work from the admin side.

3. My staging-first workflow (how I avoid a messy beauty launch)

Beauty stores are media-heavy. If you experiment on production, you will break things.

Here’s my standard Lamor staging routine:

  1. Clone production stack into staging
    Same server version, caching layer, image CDN rules, and theme plugin set.

  2. Install Lamor and import demo content
    Not to copy it, but to study the authors’ intended structure.

  3. Map the demo to a real content spec
    I list out where products, categories, banners, and trust sections are supposed to live.

  4. Delete demo noise early
    I keep the structural spine, delete decorative fluff.

  5. Rebuild with real catalog data
    I don’t paste placeholder copy. Real copy exposes real admin friction.

Lamor’s demo was clean enough to study without feeling like a visual circus. That’s a good sign for long-term usability.

4. Setting a beauty-specific content architecture

Before I touched colors or layout styling, I wrote a content architecture that reflected how beauty shoppers think.

Core category design

Instead of only “Skincare” or “Makeup,” I used second-level structure that matches intent:

Skincare

  • Cleansers
  • Toners / Essences
  • Serums
  • Moisturizers
  • Sunscreens
  • Masks / Treatments

Makeup

  • Base (primer, foundation, concealer)
  • Eyes
  • Lips
  • Cheeks
  • Brushes / Tools

Haircare

  • Shampoo
  • Treatment / Masks
  • Styling

Body

  • Wash
  • Lotion
  • Hand & Foot

Filter priorities

Filters must match real browsing intent:

  • skin type (oily, dry, sensitive, combo)
  • concern (acne, brightening, anti-aging, hydration)
  • finish / texture (matte, dewy, gel, cream)
  • ingredient flags (fragrance-free, vegan, cruelty-free)
  • price band
  • brand

Lamor’s category and shop layouts support a strong filter posture without looking cramped on mobile.

5. Home page as a routine funnel, not a promo poster

Beauty homepages often collapse into banners and discount badges. That makes the store feel like a cheap bazaar, and it kills trust. My Lamor homepage approach was different:

My final home order

  1. Hero “choose your path” band Two or three routine-based buttons like:
  • “Build a gentle routine”
  • “Solve acne and texture”
  • “Try a new lip finish”

  1. Trending categories strip
    Small and scannable, not a giant grid.

  2. Best-selling routines (not just products)
    We surfaced bundles or “paired picks.”

  3. Brand trust lane
    A calm strip showing quality signals (not loud badges).

  4. Seasonal spotlight
    One focused feature, not five.

  5. Editorial mini-content
    Short “how to use” posts or ingredient explainers.

  6. A quiet CTA
    A “consult our routine guide” link path, not a hard sell.

Lamor’s blocks let me build this without inventing custom home templates. The main admin discipline was to keep the funnel routine-first. When home flows like a routine guide, conversion goes up because people feel you understand their problem.

6. Product page anatomy (the part that decides conversion)

A cosmetics product page has to do three jobs simultaneously:

  1. describe the product
  2. prove safety and fit
  3. show how to use it in context

I used a fixed Lamor product anatomy and trained staff to follow it.

Required sections for every SKU

  1. Short benefit headline
    One line, factual, not hype.

  2. Who it’s for
    3–5 bullets based on skin type and concern.

  3. Texture / finish note
    Beauty shoppers want to imagine the feel.

  4. How to use
    A specific step-by-step routine placement.

  5. Key ingredients
    No medical claims. Just clear highlights.

  6. Safety / suitability icons
    e.g., fragrance-free, cruelty-free, etc.

  7. Before/after or results gallery
    Only if reliable.

  8. Reviews / social proof
    Keep it honest. Don’t overload.

  9. Cross-sell: pairs well with
    Routine pairing is more powerful than generic “related products.”

Lamor’s product layout handles this without forcing you into huge long paragraphs. It encourages scannability, which matches the way beauty shoppers skim.

7. Variants and shade logic (small detail, big impact)

Beauty shops die on variant UX. If shades, sizes, or scent variations are confusing, nothing else matters.

My admin rules:

  • always show shade names clearly
  • avoid vague labels like “Option 1”
  • use consistent imagery per variant
  • keep the variant picker above the fold
  • show a short variant explanation (“cool pink,” “warm coral,” etc.)

Lamor’s variant area is clean and doesn’t feel like a tiny ecommerce afterthought. On mobile, it stays usable without scrolling hunts.

8. Category pages and filters: where beauty browsing lives

Visitors use category pages more than you think, especially when they’re exploring concerns or trends.

What I set up in Lamor

  • Grid cards with visible key info
    Price, short benefit, and a routine tag.

  • Fast filter access on mobile
    I tested a few patterns; Lamor’s default placement worked.

  • Short category intro text
    One paragraph max. Nobody reads a dissertation before filtering.

  • Stable pagination
    I kept classic paging rather than infinite scroll. Infinite scroll is hard for returning buyers who want to “resume browsing.”

Lamor’s archive grid is balanced: enough visual presence for beauty photography, without collapsing into heavy tiles.

9. Performance discipline (beauty sites are heavy by nature)

A theme can be fast, but cosmetics media can still sink you. The old site was bloated because staff uploaded raw photos.

My media policy:

  • hero images max width around 2200–2400px
  • product gallery images max width around 1600–2000px
  • compress before upload
  • keep consistent aspect ratios
  • avoid autoplay video in archives
  • limit gallery to 6–12 strong images per product

Lamor still looks premium under these constraints. Some themes only look good when images are huge. That’s not sustainable.

10. Feature evaluation (what I actually used)

10.1 Beauty-native home blocks

The theme’s home blocks are designed for focused merchandising, not random content walls. That helped keep the site calm.

10.2 Product storytelling layouts

Lamor supports long-form product narrative without forcing ugly sidebars. For skincare brands, that matters.

10.3 Shop and category UI

Filters and grids are clean, with good breathing space on mobile.

10.4 Wishlist and comparison posture

Beauty shoppers like to collect options. Lamor supports this behavior naturally.

I didn’t need to add a pile of extra styling plugins just to make the shop behavior feel on-brand.

11. SEO posture for beauty ecommerce

Beauty SEO is not just “rank for product names.” It’s long-tail intent like:

  • “best serum for oily skin”
  • “fragrance-free moisturizer”
  • “matte lipstick shade for warm skin”
  • “how to build a simple routine”

11.1 Category pages as intent hubs

I wrote short, clear category intros aligned with browsing intent. For example:

  • “Serums for targeted concerns”
  • “Sunscreens by finish and skin type”

Because Lamor’s category pages are structured and scannable, those intros don’t feel awkward.

11.2 Product pages as routine anchors

The “how to use” section became a routine anchor. It improves both conversion and long-tail search.

11.3 Editorial mini-content

I kept the blog light but consistent:

  • ingredient spotlights
  • routine guides
  • seasonal tips

Lamor’s blog styling is clean enough that editorial content doesn’t feel like a separate site.

12. Trust signals that don’t look like spam

Beauty shoppers are skeptical. They’ve seen too many fake claims.

Instead of loud badges, I used calm, repeatable trust signals:

  • “dermatologist-tested” only when truly supported
  • clear ingredient highlights
  • transparent “who it’s for” notes
  • real reviews with moderate tone
  • a short brand story on product pages

Lamor’s design is quiet enough to let trust signals land without screaming.

13. Admin workflow (keeping the team happy)

If your staff hates adding products, your catalog will rot.

Adding a new SKU in Lamor

With my process, staff can add a product in about 8–12 minutes:

  1. create product
  2. add title + short benefit line
  3. assign category and filters
  4. fill “who it’s for” bullets
  5. add texture/finish note
  6. write use-step routine placement
  7. insert key ingredient highlights
  8. upload compressed images
  9. publish

Because Lamor’s product template expects these blocks, editors didn’t improvise. That prevents drift.

14. Mistakes I avoided (learned the hard way)

  1. Over-categorization
    Beauty taxonomies explode quickly. Keep them shallow.

  2. Too many homepage promos
    One seasonal spotlight is enough.

  3. Long ingredient paragraphs
    Keep it scannable and factual.

  4. Letting staff invent layouts
    Templates are your brand guardrails.

  5. Underestimating mobile browsing
    I checked every archive and product page on phones weekly during build.

Lamor helped because it has a strong default rhythm; I just had to keep discipline.

15. Alternatives I considered

15.1 Generic ecommerce themes

Pros:

  • flexible
  • big demo libraries

Cons:

  • no routine-native posture
  • filters feel bolted on
  • product pages drift fast
  • beauty trust signals look out of place

15.2 Ultra-minimal boutique themes

Pros:

  • clean
  • fast

Cons:

  • too little structure for a growing catalog
  • harder to map routine and concern filters
  • merchandising feels thin

Lamor sits in the sweet spot for beauty: structured enough for scale, but still visually soft and premium.

16. Who Lamor is best for

From an admin/operator perspective, Lamor fits:

  • skincare boutiques
  • cosmetics or makeup brands
  • salon product stores
  • K-beauty or niche beauty importers
  • multi-brand beauty marketplaces
  • stores that rely on routine education to convert

It’s especially good if your team is small and you need predictable templates.

17. Scaling beyond 200 products

Beauty catalogs grow fast. I tested Lamor’s structure under scale conditions (lots of categories, long archives, heavy media).

It scales because:

  • archive grids stay readable
  • filters remain accessible
  • product templates are consistent
  • the design doesn’t collapse into clutter

The real scaling risk is still media bloat, not theme structure.

18. What I’d improve next time

  1. More curated routine collections Editorial pages like:
  • “Morning routine for sensitive skin”
  • “Starter routine under $50”
  • “Clear skin weekly plan”

These boost both SEO and conversion without overloading filters.

  1. A stricter imagery guide for staff Beauty imagery needs consistency. I’d provide a one-page photo checklist earlier.

These are operational improvements, not flaws in Lamor.

19. My repeatable Lamor deployment order

If I were launching another beauty store next week:

  1. install Lamor on staging
  2. import demo and study structure
  3. delete demo clutter, keep the spine
  4. define shallow beauty categories
  5. define filters by real intent
  6. lock product page anatomy
  7. build home as a routine funnel
  8. tune category archives and filtering
  9. enforce media compression rules
  10. train editors on fixed templates
  11. launch
  12. audit monthly for taxonomy drift and media bloat

This order avoids the two disasters that kill beauty stores: chaotic product pages and slow archives.

Closing thoughts

Lamor worked for me because it behaves like a beauty-specific ecommerce system, not a generic store theme painted pink. It supports routine-driven discovery, scannable product anatomy, strong filtering posture, and calm premium design—all while keeping admin workflows predictable. Pair it with clear operational rules around media and templates, and you get a store that can grow without losing brand coherence.

If you’re a WordPress admin responsible for a cosmetics or skincare shop and you want a foundation that stays trustworthy and usable as your catalog scales, Lamor is a reliable base to build on.

Top comments (0)