No use until it is supported by major browsers
Why not just use babel.js?
You as a developer don't even see the difference?
One day you will just remove the babel.js plugin and that's it.
Oh didn't see the plugin
there is a link in the Start using it today section.
Start using it today
babel-plugin-proposal-optional-cha...
yeah got it thanks!
No problem :)
We should really consider not to use it until it is available in browsers.
The polyfill is really ugly and verbose.
That's why I wrote this article
dev.to/slashgear_/optional-chainin...
I have a confession to make.
I really really dislike lodash and underscore.
lodash
underscore
If you look at babel code, in general, it does not look good.
babel
Besides that looking at the lodash code it is not much better ;)
But that's just my opinion, there is no right or wrong here!
Totally agree:)
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
No use until it is supported by major browsers
Why not just use babel.js?
You as a developer don't even see the difference?
One day you will just remove the babel.js plugin and that's it.
Oh didn't see the plugin
there is a link in the
Start using it todaysection.babel-plugin-proposal-optional-cha...
yeah got it thanks!
No problem :)
We should really consider not to use it until it is available in browsers.
The polyfill is really ugly and verbose.
That's why I wrote this article
dev.to/slashgear_/optional-chainin...
I have a confession to make.
I really really dislike
lodashandunderscore.If you look at
babelcode,in general, it does not look good.
Besides that looking at the lodash code it is not much better ;)
But that's just my opinion, there is no right or wrong here!
Totally agree:)