Good, Java has annotations (kind of decorators). I don't know if you think if this is good or bad. To me decorators are a powerful tool. Many frameworks make hard use of them.
Discussion is only on implementation details, they're unlikely to remove any of its features as I see on tc39 threads, even adding more.
Decorators are very easy to use if you know to do that. I think you're a bit influenced by your past experience with Java annotations. I know, that thing was a nightmare.
I do find that the problem was some design failures by framework it self (spring) rather than the idea about use decorators to encapsulate behaviors.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Are you sure you are using the right language here? It reminds me of Java ...
Good, Java has annotations (kind of decorators). I don't know if you think if this is good or bad. To me decorators are a powerful tool. Many frameworks make hard use of them.
Yep, I'm using the right language here.
Decorators are harder to use than misuse. Plus they are experimental (stage 2) so expect some debates against them.
Discussion is only on implementation details, they're unlikely to remove any of its features as I see on tc39 threads, even adding more.
Decorators are very easy to use if you know to do that. I think you're a bit influenced by your past experience with Java annotations. I know, that thing was a nightmare.
I do find that the problem was some design failures by framework it self (spring) rather than the idea about use decorators to encapsulate behaviors.