DEV Community

Toby Water
Toby Water

Posted on

You Don't Have a Vocabulary Problem. You Have a Chunk Problem.

Why "can read, can't speak" learners should stop collecting words and start collecting ready-made pieces of English.


For a long time, my English had a strange split personality. I could read articles, follow documentation, even write decent emails (slowly, with a dictionary tab open). But put me in an actual conversation and I froze — not because I didn't know the words, but because I was building every sentence from scratch, translating from Chinese in my head, one word at a time. By the time my sentence was ready, the conversation had moved on.

The fix, when it finally came, was almost insultingly simple: native speakers don't build most sentences from scratch either. They reuse chunks.

What is a chunk?

A chunk (linguists call them formulaic sequences or lexical chunks) is a multi-word unit that gets stored and retrieved as a single piece: I mean. By the way. The thing is… As soon as. A couple of. It looks like.

You already understand hundreds of these when you read. The problem is the gap between recognizing a chunk and producing it under time pressure. That gap doesn't close by reading more. It closes by deliberately practicing a finite list of chunks until they come out whole.

Why chunks beat word lists for speaking

  1. Speed. A chunk is one retrieval instead of five. "The thing is" takes zero assembly; its word-by-word equivalent takes a full committee meeting in your head.
  2. Naturalness. Chunks are how English actually sounds. Nobody says "I would like to supplement a point." Everybody says "By the way."
  3. A finish line. "Learn more vocabulary" never ends. A list of 100 chunks ends in 20 days — and 100 well-chosen chunks cover a surprising share of everyday talk: opening, connecting, hedging, timing, quantity, impressions.

The method: 5 chunks a day, four steps each

  1. Meaning + a scene. Read the explanation, then picture one moment in your own life where you'd say it.
  2. Read the examples out loud, twice. I use 3 original example sentences per chunk. Second pass, cover the English and say it from the translation.
  3. Steal one sentence. Change the names, places, details until it's true about you. Say your version out loud. This is the step everyone skips and the only one that really matters.
  4. Review before new. Next day starts with yesterday's 5. On day 21, do a self-test: look at the meaning, produce the chunk in under 3 seconds, star the ones you miss, and only re-drill the stars.

Total: 15–20 minutes a day.

Start with these 20

Starting & connecting — I mean · by the way · to be honest · the thing is · for example
Quantity — a lot of · a bit of · a couple of · plenty of · too much
Time — on time · all the time · once in a while · sooner or later · as soon as
Impressions — it looks like · it sounds like · it feels like · kind of · more or less

If you can read all 20 but have never said half of them out loud, you have exactly the recognition/production gap this method is for.

Three traps

  • Collecting without speaking. A chunk you have only read is trivia. A chunk you have said 10 times is a tool.
  • Doing 20 a day to "finish faster." You'll retain four. Five a day, reviewed, beats twenty skimmed.
  • Never personalizing the examples. Generic sentences stay generic. The sentence about your boss, your rent, your flight is the one you'll actually reach for.

Get the free sample

I turned my own list into a study pack: 100 everyday chunks, each with a Chinese explanation, 3 original example sentences with translations, a usage tip, a 21-day plan, an Anki deck, and printable cards. The first 20 chunks — the ones listed above, fully worked out in an 11-page PDF — are a free sample.

You can get the sample and see the full version here: https://tobywater.pages.dev

If you try the sample, I want one piece of feedback: are 3 example sentences per chunk enough, or should v2 use short dialogues instead? That's a real decision I'm making, and learner answers beat my guessing.

Top comments (0)