DEV Community

Tran Tien Van
Tran Tien Van

Posted on Originally published at vanaxity.com

Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 Max

Four flagship models, four very different bets on price, openness, and proof. Here is how Fable 5.1, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Kimi K3, and Qwen 3.8 Max compare.

Key takeaways

  • Fable 5.1 (Anthropic, September 2026) is the most capable on its own benchmarks and the priciest at $10 per million input and $50 per million output, with cache reads cut to $0.25.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google, August 2026) is the cheap fast workhorse: introductory $0.75 input and $3.75 output per million, a 1M-token context, and strong coding and agentic scores.
  • Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) is the strongest open-weight model, with downloadable weights and independent verification, including 93.4% SWE-bench Verified on Vals AI's harness and a top open-weight Intelligence Index score.
  • Qwen 3.8 Max (Alibaba) is a capable multimodal enterprise API, but Alibaba has published no benchmarks, so its 'second only to Fable 5' claim is unverified for now.
  • Vanaxity's recommendation: pick by the axis that binds you, cost, openness, or verified capability, and measure the finalists on your own tasks.

📖 Read the full guide on Van Data Team → Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 Max

Top comments (0)