I just read your article, and there is one point that bothers me in this CSS reset.
For example, your idea of removing "list-style" and "padding" on "ul [class]" has too much of a too powerful selector.
Imagine that I want to change the style of UL with a "class", I will logically use ".my-list", but your selector will be more powerful. And I could not change neither the "padding" nor the "list-style", it is absolutely necessary to put more selector:
Hello,
I just read your article, and there is one point that bothers me in this CSS reset.
For example, your idea of removing "list-style" and "padding" on "ul [class]" has too much of a too powerful selector.
Imagine that I want to change the style of UL with a "class", I will logically use ".my-list", but your selector will be more powerful. And I could not change neither the "padding" nor the "list-style", it is absolutely necessary to put more selector:
Your CSS reset is therefore not compatible with the BEM method for example. en.bem.info/methodology/css/
I would tend to let the developer choose if he needs to delete or not the style on with a "class"