Startle the snake by striking the grass.
— The 36 Stratagems, Stomp the Grass to Scare the Snake
Previously on this series:
#1: Mark Johnson ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
The bait parameter is the right instinct, but I'd make it earn more than a yes. One canary confirms the pipeline exists; a set of them, uniquely tokenized across posts, phrasings, and timing, turns the callback into a readout of the crawler's decision boundary, whether it's keyword-matched or semantic, its latency, how narrow its selection is. You stop confirming the trap is reachable and start making it reveal how it decides. And the pipeline that called P is also the one holding the risk: scraping public text is one thing, resolving a handle to a CRM identity and phoning them is personal-data processing for outreach with no basis. The clever part is the exposed part.
Spot on about the multi-canary approach. I'll keep it in my back pocket for the next time this pipeline shows up.
P's growth arc is still a work in progress. Mark comes from audit too. What I'm hoping for is that their eventual collaboration won't be 1+1 — it'll be:
one sees patterns in the data, the other sees the people behind the patterns.
That's the version I want to write.
(Still figuring out how to get it on the page. But that's the direction.)
That last line is the whole thing: one sees the pattern, the other sees the person it lands on. The version that would grab me is where they don't add up, they collide, the data says act and the human read says that's exactly why not, and the story sits in who's right this time. I work the pattern side for a living, and the part I never get used to is that every clean signal is a person on the other end. Looking forward to that one.
I can't promise which stratagem it'll be — but I can promise that every single one will be as good as I can make it. Thanks for the consistently high-quality comments.👊
Anytime. Some of the sharpest threads on here, I'll keep showing up for them. 👊
The uncomfortable part is that the signal is real and the timing is wrong.
A public question can reveal intent, urgency, stack, budget, and pain. That is valuable context. But if the outreach feels like surveillance instead of help, the company burns trust before the first conversation starts.
That's exactly the tension I wanted to sit in. The crawler was technically impressive — pattern matching, tech-stack extraction, CRM routing, all automated. It outperformed the sales team on every metric. And it still lost, because the prospect felt watched, not helped.
What made P's honeypot work wasn't beating the crawler. It was understanding what it was optimizing for and designing a variable it couldn't account for: a technically valid but deliberately wrong answer. The crawler was too good at its job to question the input.
Yes. The signal can be real while the timing is wrong. That is the awkward part with agent alerts and review gates: if the system interrupts too early, people ignore it; if it waits too long, it becomes archaeology. The useful middle ground is usually tied to irreversible action, not every intermediate uncertainty.
Okay... I'm late again , but I finally made it to another Stratagem post!
Every new Stratagem post gives me trust issues...
I used to think, "It's just one innocent question on a public forum. Who would even notice?" Turns out... apparently everyone except me.
What I love about your writing is that it doesn't scream "the internet is scary!" Instead, it quietly reminds us that tiny pieces of information can become a complete puzzle in the hands of someone paying attention. That's both fascinating and a little terrifying.
My browser history is officially requesting legal representation now, wait I am kidding!
Thanks for another brilliant read! Your Stratagem series keeps teaching important lessons without feeling like a lecture, and that's a rare skill. Looking forward to the next "wait... I never thought of that!" moment. ❤️👏
The next stratagem is already in my Dev.to drafts. It goes live in about 12 hours. Patience, lol 🤣
The 36 Stratagems series has officially entered its third set. The protagonists are about to become a lot more proactive.👊
Gonna read this one when I'm back from my cycling trip, deserves attention and not rushing it :-)
Enjoy the ride 🚴♂️ No rush — this one's not going anywhere. The goat will wait 😄
Yeah I'm gonna go out, need my exercise - already sitting behind a screen too much lol !
One thing I enjoy about this series is how earlier stories keep paying off later. Mark's first Pulse AI audit becoming relevant again, and now intersecting with P's investigation, makes the world feel much more connected. Looking forward to seeing how that partnership develops 😀
That's exactly the goal — every thread should feel like it was always there, just waiting for the right moment to surface. Mark and P have very different styles, which makes writing their dynamic the most fun part. Let's just say: the partnership hasn't seen its last test yet. 😄
This one's got a great atmosphere of 'suspense' - nice one also with the Dev.to references, "life imitating art" (or rather the other way around?) :-)
Appreciate you catching that. The Dev.to references are my favorite part of writing this series — the line between "story device" and "something that could actually happen on this platform" gets thinner with every article. Glad it landed. 🤣