Series 3 — Part 1 of 2
GetX in Flutter — Part 1: State Management and Navigation
Series: Exploring Flutter State Management Alternatives
After spending weeks with Riverpod, my mentor asked me to explore GetX — a framework that promises to handle state management, dependency injection, and navigation all in one package. I was sceptical. Riverpod had given me clean, testable ViewModels and explicit dependency graphs. GetX felt opinionated in a different way.
I spent a few days reading the GetX docs, watching video walkthroughs, and then building a basic app from scratch. Here is what I found.
What GetX gives you
GetX bundles three things that Riverpod keeps separate:
-
State management: Uses
GetxControllerinstead ofAsyncNotifier. -
Navigation: Removes the need for a
BuildContext—Get.to()andGet.back()work from anywhere. -
Dependency injection: Done through
Get.put()andGet.find()rather than Riverpod providers.
Building a basic GetX app
I created a fresh Flutter project and built a minimal app with a list screen and a detail screen. The GetxController looked clean at first:
class ProductController extends GetxController {
final products = <Product>[].obs;
void loadProducts() => products.assignAll(fetchFromApi());
}
The .obs suffix makes the list reactive. Widgets that use Obx(() => ...) rebuild when the value changes. It feels fast to write, and the boilerplate is noticeably less than a Riverpod AsyncNotifier setup.
GetX navigation
Navigation with GetX is genuinely convenient. You do not need a BuildContext to push a route:
// Navigating without BuildContext
Get.to(() => const DetailScreen());
Get.back();
Get.to() and Get.back() work from inside a controller, which is useful when you want to navigate after an async operation completes.
The trade-off is that this convenience comes at the cost of testability. Routes become global state. Testing navigation logic requires more mocking and setup than with go_router.
Implementing MVVM with GetX
I structured the GetX app using MVVM conventions — controllers as ViewModels, repositories as the data layer, and views as pure widget trees. GetX does not enforce this structure, but it works well when you apply it deliberately.
What I learned
- Less boilerplate: GetX reduces boilerplate significantly compared to Riverpod for simple state cases.
- Context-free tradeoffs: The context-free navigation is convenient but reduces modular testability.
- Architecture is discipline: GetX can work well with MVVM if you apply the pattern yourself — it does not enforce it.
-
Safety vs Speed: For complex apps with lots of async state, Riverpod's
AsyncNotifieris more explicit and safer.
Next: Part 2 — GetX Dependency Injection and Comparing with Riverpod
Top comments (0)