My solutions in Elixir. I'm just posting the final solution for part two since that essentially contains the solution for part one as well. A very nice day to use the power of pattern-matching!
defmodule Aoc19.Day4b do @moduledoc false def start do {lower, upper} = read() check(lower, upper, 0) end defp check(current, upper, count) when current <= upper do with :ok <- adjacent?(current), :ok <- increasing?(current) do check(current + 1, upper, count + 1) else _ -> check(current + 1, upper, count) end end defp check(_, _, count), do: count defp increasing?(current) do current |> Integer.to_string() |> String.graphemes() |> is_increasing?() end defp is_increasing?([]), do: :ok defp is_increasing?([_]), do: :ok defp is_increasing?([h1, h2 | rest]) when h1 <= h2 do is_increasing?([h2 | rest]) end defp is_increasing?(_), do: :error defp adjacent?(current) do current |> Integer.to_string() |> String.graphemes() |> is_adjacent?() end defp is_adjacent?([]), do: :error defp is_adjacent?([h1, h1, h1 | rest]) do rest = skip(h1, rest) is_adjacent?(rest) end defp is_adjacent?([h1, h1 | _rest]), do: :ok defp is_adjacent?([_h1 | rest]), do: is_adjacent?(rest) defp skip(h, [h | rest]), do: skip(h, rest) defp skip(_h, rest), do: rest defp read, do: {231_832, 767_346} end
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
My solutions in Elixir. I'm just posting the final solution for part two since that essentially contains the solution for part one as well. A very nice day to use the power of pattern-matching!