I guess some people like changing history, and others don't.. lol. this one (looks at article), apparently has no problems with that.
TBH, the only "real" issue I can see with using rebase in place of merge, is when the remote Git host protects your master, I mean main, I mean trunk, I mean source-of-all-truth branch... oh, and maybe the repeat notifications for those of us who mention issue IDs in commit comments. hmm..
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I guess some people like changing history, and others don't.. lol. this one (looks at article), apparently has no problems with that.
TBH, the only "real" issue I can see with using
rebasein place ofmerge, is when the remote Git host protects yourmaster, I meanmain, I meantrunk, I meansource-of-all-truthbranch... oh, and maybe the repeat notifications for those of us who mention issue IDs in commit comments. hmm..