DEV Community

ahfu168
ahfu168

Posted on

How I’m Building SEO for a Brand Nobody Searches For Yet

#branding #seo #startup

A few days ago, I wrote about migrating an Android app from Song Flow to a new brand: MiraYola.

That post focused mostly on infrastructure:

  • keeping the Android package name stable
  • moving to a new domain
  • fixing redirects
  • setting canonical URLs
  • handling App Links
  • keeping old shared links alive
  • waiting for search engines and third-party systems to catch up

Once most of that was working, I ran into a different problem.

The migration could be technically correct, but almost nobody was searching for the new brand.

That changes the SEO problem completely.

If people already search for your company, SEO can focus on capturing existing demand.

But what if the brand is new enough that there is almost no branded demand to capture?

That is where I am with MiraYola right now.

And I definitely do not have a success story yet.

What I have instead is an experiment:

Can I gradually create a consistent search identity for a new product by making the website, app stores, developer profiles, social channels, and external content all reinforce the same brand and product category?

This post is about what I have tried so far, what is beginning to appear, what still is not working, and how my thinking about SEO has changed.

1. The first SEO problem was not ranking

My original instinct was fairly conventional.

MiraYola is an AI music product, so I started thinking about keywords such as:

AI Music Maker
AI Song Generator
Text to Song
Lyrics to Song
AI Remix Generator
AI Music Video Generator
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Those are useful terms.

But there was a more basic problem.

Google first had to understand:

What is MiraYola?
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Is it:

  • a website?
  • an Android app?
  • an iOS app?
  • an AI music generator?
  • a music discovery product?
  • a renamed version of Song Flow?
  • a random word appearing on a few unrelated pages?

For a completely new brand, I think this question comes before most traditional keyword work.

So instead of thinking only about pages and rankings, I started thinking about identity consistency.

2. The model became a matrix instead of a website

At first, I thought of SEO mainly as something happening on:

mirayola.huoji.app
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now I think about MiraYola more like this:

                    MiraYola
                       |
        --------------------------------
        |              |               |
     Website       App Stores       Content
        |              |               |
    Feature Pages   Google Play     Articles
    Live Rooms      App Store       Product Notes
    Music Plaza
        |
        --------------------------------
        |                              |
     Developer                      Social
     Identity                       Identity
        |                              |
     GitHub                        YouTube
     GitHub Pages                  Instagram
                                  X
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

None of these surfaces is individually very powerful.

The idea is that they should gradually tell the same story.

For example:

MiraYola
→ AI Music Maker
→ AI Song Generator
→ Create Music
→ Discover AI Music
→ Live AI Music Experiences
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If Google encounters the same relationship across multiple independent surfaces, my hope is that the brand becomes easier to understand over time.

I am treating this as an entity-building experiment, not just a backlink campaign.

3. I started by making the product identity boringly consistent

This sounds simple, but it was surprisingly easy to get wrong.

After the rename, there were many possible descriptions:

MiraYola
MiraYola AI Music
MiraYola AI Music Maker
MiraYola Music Exploration Space
MiraYola AI Song Generator
Song Flow / MiraYola
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Using all of them everywhere would create noise.

So I gradually moved toward one primary relationship:

Brand:
MiraYola

Primary category:
AI Music Maker

Supporting concepts:
AI Song Generator
AI Music Creation
AI Remix
AI Music Video
AI Music Discovery
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

That is why the store name is now close to:

MiraYola: AI Music Maker
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The website uses the same relationship.

My developer site describes MiraYola similarly.

The social profiles are moving in the same direction.

This is not sophisticated SEO.

It is mostly consistency.

But for a new brand, I suspect consistency is more valuable than trying to invent a different optimized tagline for every platform.

4. The website now has two jobs

The MiraYola website originally felt more like a product experience.

It contains things such as:

  • Live Rooms
  • Music Plaza
  • music discovery
  • previews of the product experience

That is useful for users, but it does not automatically create strong search entry points.

So I started giving the website a second job:

explain individual product capabilities in the language people actually search for.

That led to feature pages around concepts such as:

AI Song Generator
Text to Song
Lyrics to Song
AI Remix
AI Music Video
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The important part was not simply creating one page per keyword.

I wanted each page to represent a real difference in user intent.

For example:

Text to Song

The user has an idea:

A quiet song about meeting an old friend again
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

but does not necessarily have lyrics.

Lyrics to Song

The user already has words and wants to turn those words into music.

Those queries look similar from a product implementation perspective, but they represent different starting points for the user.

That distinction became my rule:

I do not want to create two pages only because two keywords are different. I want to create two pages when the search intent is meaningfully different.

I am still applying this rule imperfectly.

There is always a temptation to create:

/ai-music-maker
/ai-music-generator
/ai-song-maker
/ai-song-generator
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

and hope four pages are better than one.

They probably are not if they all say the same thing.

This has become one of the bigger lessons from the experiment.

Keywords are not the same thing as pages.

5. The website does not pretend to do something it cannot do

There is another complication.

MiraYola has a web presence, but the full creation workflow currently happens in the app.

That creates an SEO problem.

Imagine someone searches:

text to song
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

lands on a webpage, and discovers that the actual generation happens inside an app.

It would be easy to build an SEO page that looks like an online generator even though it is not.

I decided against that.

The feature pages explicitly explain what the feature does and then tell the user that creation continues in the MiraYola app.

The page still needs to be useful on its own:

  • explain the workflow
  • explain what input is expected
  • give examples
  • distinguish it from related features
  • answer common questions
  • show where to continue

This may or may not be enough to rank competitively.

I do not know yet.

But I would rather test an honest landing page than manufacture fake tool pages purely for search traffic.

6. The App Store and Google Play are part of the same SEO system

I used to mentally separate SEO and ASO.

Now I think the separation is less useful for a product like this.

The Google Play listing currently describes MiraYola using concepts such as:

AI music maker
AI song generator
text to song
lyrics to music
AI remix
instrumental music
music video
music discovery
live AI music
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The App Store uses the same core brand/category relationship:

MiraYola: AI Music Maker
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The website then reinforces those same concepts.

So instead of:

Website SEO
      +
Google Play ASO
      +
App Store ASO
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I am thinking more like:

                MiraYola
                    |
        -------------------------
        |           |           |
       Web      Google Play   App Store
        |           |           |
        -------------------------
                    |
             AI Music Maker
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The terminology does not need to be identical word-for-word.

But the systems should not disagree about what the product is.

7. GitHub became part of the identity layer too

I also created a simple GitHub Pages developer site.

Its purpose is not to rank for competitive AI music keywords.

It exists primarily to establish another understandable relationship:

Developer
    ↓
Products
    ↓
MiraYola
    ↓
Official Website / Store
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The site lists my products and describes MiraYola as an AI music maker and exploration product.

I also updated my developer-facing profiles so that MiraYola is associated with the same creator identity.

This made me reconsider how I think about backlinks.

Previously I would have asked:

Is this a dofollow backlink?

Now I am also asking:

Does this page help establish a believable relationship between the developer, the brand, the website, and the product?

A link from a developer profile may never move a competitive keyword by itself.

But it can still be part of a coherent identity graph.

8. I started writing about the problems instead of the product

I do not want every external article to say:

MiraYola is an amazing AI music app. Download it here.

That would quickly turn into low-value self-promotion.

Instead, I am trying to write about problems that actually happened while building the product.

The previous article was one example.

The subject was not:

Introducing MiraYola
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It was:

What I Learned Migrating an Android App
to a New Brand and Domain
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

MiraYola appeared because it was the real product involved in the problem.

This article follows the same principle.

The topic is not really:

Please search for MiraYola.

It is:

What do you actually do with SEO when your brand is too new to have meaningful branded search demand?

That creates a more natural relationship:

Developer experience
        ↓
Real implementation
        ↓
MiraYola
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I have been experimenting with longer-form articles and product notes in a similar way, writing about product decisions, technical problems, branding, and AI music instead of republishing store descriptions.

Whether any of this produces meaningful search authority remains to be seen.

At this point I care more about creating legitimate references than manufacturing large numbers of weak links.

9. Social media is not only a traffic channel

YouTube, Instagram, and X originally felt separate from SEO.

I am beginning to treat them as part of the same brand system.

The direct traffic from these channels is still small.

But they create public objects associated with the brand:

MiraYola YouTube channel
MiraYola videos
MiraYola social profile
MiraYola music content
MiraYola AI music descriptions
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The strategy is not to put twenty SEO keywords into every caption.

It is much simpler:

Brand
+
Content category
+
Repeated real usage
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For example, a music video can naturally associate:

MiraYola
AI Music
AI Music Video
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

A product demonstration can associate:

MiraYola
AI Song Generator
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

A Live Room clip can associate:

MiraYola
AI Singer
Live Music Experience
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The profiles then connect back to the same product identity.

Again, I do not know how much direct ranking value this produces.

That is not something I want to pretend I can measure yet.

But it makes the public footprint much more coherent than having one isolated website trying to establish a new word by itself.

10. I also started thinking about sameAs

Structured data became another part of this experiment.

Conceptually, I want the website to be able to express something like:

MiraYola
  ├── Website
  ├── App
  ├── Developer
  ├── YouTube
  ├── GitHub
  └── Other official profiles
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Schema such as Organization, SoftwareApplication, and sameAs can help express those relationships.

I do not treat structured data as a ranking hack.

Adding:

"sameAs": [...]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

does not suddenly create brand authority.

I see it more as reducing ambiguity.

If I am already maintaining several official identities, I want machines to have an explicit way to understand that they belong together.

11. What has actually happened so far?

This is where I want to be careful.

The experiment has not succeeded yet.

MiraYola is still a very young brand.

Branded search volume is tiny.

The website is still being crawled and re-indexed.

Some SEO pages are only beginning to appear in search.

The external footprint is still small.

And after changing the Google Play name from Song Flow to MiraYola, store browsing impressions dropped noticeably.

That last part is especially important.

A rebrand can destroy some of the recognition the old listing had accumulated before the new identity has earned anything to replace it.

So the current situation is not:

Rebrand
→ SEO strategy
→ traffic growth
→ success
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It looks much more like:

Rebrand
        ↓
Old signals weakened
        ↓
New brand has little demand
        ↓
Rebuild identity across platforms
        ↓
Wait for crawling / indexing / association
        ↓
Measure
        ↓
Adjust
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

And I am somewhere in the middle.

12. There are still some early signals

Although I would not call them results yet, a few things are at least moving in the intended direction.

MiraYola now exists publicly across multiple independent surfaces.

The search engine can encounter:

Official website
Feature pages
Google Play
App Store
GitHub / developer site
Long-form articles
YouTube
Social profiles
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Some of the new website feature pages are already discoverable.

The app stores use the new brand.

The GitHub developer site contains the new brand.

YouTube has moved to the new identity.

Third-party app indexes have also started reflecting the new name.

This is a very different situation from the first day of the rename, when MiraYola was essentially a word with almost no history.

But this is still presence, not authority.

That distinction matters.

Having ten URLs containing your brand name does not mean people search for the brand.

Being indexed does not mean ranking for competitive generic keywords.

And having social profiles does not automatically improve organic traffic.

The only thing I can reasonably say right now is:

the entity is becoming more consistently represented across the web.

Whether that eventually turns into rankings or branded demand is the next part of the experiment.

13. My current SEO model has three layers

After doing this for a while, I now think of MiraYola's SEO in three layers.

Layer 1: Brand identity

Make sure search engines can answer:

What is MiraYola?
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Signals include:

  • official website
  • app stores
  • developer identity
  • social profiles
  • structured data
  • external mentions

Layer 2: Product category

Make sure the relationship is understandable:

MiraYola
    ↓
AI Music Maker
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

with supporting concepts such as:

AI Song Generator
AI Remix
AI Music Video
AI Music Discovery
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Layer 3: Search intent

Only then do individual pages compete for things like:

Text to Song
Lyrics to Song
AI Song Generator
AI Remix Generator
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I previously jumped almost immediately to Layer 3.

Now I think a new brand needs all three.

14. The matrix I am building now

The current version looks roughly like this:

Surface Main purpose
Official website Canonical brand identity
Feature pages Capture specific product/search intent
Google Play Android product identity + category
App Store iOS product identity + category
GitHub Profile Developer identity
GitHub Pages Developer → product relationship
Long-form articles Real implementation and product thinking
YouTube Product + music/video content
Instagram Visual/music content
X Brand activity and product updates
Structured data Connect official identities
Existing directories Independent product references

The goal is not:

Get backlinks from all of them.
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The goal is:

Make all of them describe roughly
the same real thing.
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

That is a subtle difference, but it has changed how I choose SEO work.

15. What I am deliberately not doing

There are also several things I am trying to avoid.

Creating dozens of near-identical landing pages

I would rather have one strong page for one real intent than five pages that differ only by replacing “maker” with “generator.”

Publishing the same promotional article everywhere

That creates URLs, but not necessarily useful signals.

Repeating the exact same keyword unnaturally

Consistency does not mean copy-pasting the same sentence across every platform.

Judging SEO changes after one or two days

This has been one of the hardest habits to break.

Search Console reports are delayed.

Crawling is delayed.

Indexing is delayed.

Ranking responses are delayed.

Third-party sites update on their own schedules.

SEO has much longer feedback loops than most product development.

16. What I am watching next

The next stage is measurement.

I want to see whether several things change over time.

Branded search

Does:

MiraYola
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

eventually produce a cleaner SERP dominated by the official product and profiles?

Brand + category

Do searches such as:

MiraYola AI Music
MiraYola AI Music Maker
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

become clearly associated with the product?

Feature queries

Can specific pages begin getting impressions for:

text to song
lyrics to song
AI remix generator
AI song generator
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

even if they start far from page one?

App discovery

Does Google Play browsing recover after the rename and metadata changes settle?

External discovery

Do independent developer pages, articles, videos, social profiles, and product listings start appearing around branded searches?

Those will be more meaningful signals than simply counting backlinks.

17. The biggest change has been how I think about SEO

Before this migration, my mental model was close to:

Keyword
   ↓
Page
   ↓
Backlinks
   ↓
Ranking
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I still think all of those things matter.

But for a brand that almost nobody searches for yet, I now think the earlier stage looks more like:

Consistent identity
        ↓
Independent references
        ↓
Product/category association
        ↓
Search engine confidence
        ↓
Search visibility
        ↓
Eventually, branded demand
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

I cannot prove yet that this strategy will work for MiraYola.

That is part of why I wanted to write this now rather than after the fact.

Success stories tend to make experiments look much cleaner than they really were.

Right now the situation is messy.

Some pages are indexed.

Some are still settling.

The new brand exists across more surfaces.

Google Play visibility took a hit after the rename.

Generic AI music keywords are extremely competitive.

And almost nobody wakes up in the morning already planning to search for “MiraYola.”

That is the actual starting point.

Final takeaway

My previous post ended with the idea that a rebrand is really an infrastructure migration.

I would add another lesson now:

After the infrastructure migration comes an identity migration.

Changing:

Song Flow
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

into:

MiraYola
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

inside the application was easy.

Getting the wider internet to gradually understand:

MiraYola
    =
AI Music Maker
    +
AI Song Creation
    +
AI Music Discovery
    +
Live AI Music Experiences
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

is much slower.

So for now, I am not trying to claim an SEO win.

I am building the matrix, watching what gets indexed, watching which queries begin producing impressions, and trying to make every public surface tell a consistent story.

Maybe six months from now this experiment will look smart.

Maybe I will discover that half of these signals mattered much less than I expected.

Either result will be useful.

For now, the experiment continues.

MiraYola is the AI music product I am currently building and was previously known as Song Flow.

Website: https://mirayola.huoji.app

The previous post in this series is “What I Learned Migrating an Android App to a New Brand and Domain.”

AI-assisted disclosure: AI was used to help organize and edit this article. The product decisions, SEO experiments, migration issues, and observations are based on the actual MiraYola project.

Top comments (0)