AI assisted with source research and drafting. The prototype described below is a proposal, not a completed playtest or a claim of personal gameplay experience.
Explosions are obvious places to spend an action game's feedback budget. A routine pickup is easier to overlook. Yet it may happen far more often, so its response deserves attention before another spectacular effect is added.
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart provides a concrete SF example: the player can feel a small reward arriving through the controller.
Look at the ordinary action
In a May 2021 PlayStation Blog contribution, Insomniac Games describes using haptics for more than weapon fire and wrench impacts. Collecting bolts produces small impulses accompanied by subtle controller audio. Highlighting items in the weapon wheel or map also produces a faint tactile click.
The team presents these details as ways to make ordinary interactions more satisfying. That is the developer's description, not a measured result reported by this article.
The interesting design choice is the scale of the response. A pickup does not need to borrow the force of an explosion to acknowledge the player's action. A short, restrained response can give a small interaction its own texture.
That suggests a useful question for an SF prototype: what should collecting a piece of fictional machinery feel like, and how often will the player feel it?
Review a sequence, not one perfect pickup
Imagine a fictional repair game in which a maintenance robot collects loose energy cells. Each cell disappears into its container and increments a visible count. Keep that basic confirmation intact.
For a first experiment, make two versions:
- A uses the existing animation, count update and short pickup sound.
- B keeps those elements and adds a brief, low-intensity controller pulse when the cell is actually collected.
These are proposed prototype rules, not a reconstruction of Rift Apart. Keep the reward value, movement and pickup locations unchanged. Otherwise, a more generous reward could be mistaken for better feedback.
Begin with one cell, then try several collected in quick succession. A pulse that feels pleasant in isolation may become a continuous buzz when events overlap. The sequence matters because the player experiences the combined output, not the individual effect assets.
If the rapid sequence becomes muddy, test a shorter response or a grouped response for closely spaced pickups. Treat grouping as another hypothesis: it might reduce clutter, but it could also make separate rewards harder to notice. Do not silently change the reward count to match the number of pulses.
Ask players what they noticed and whether the collection felt satisfying, distracting or tiring. Also check whether they can tell when collection has finished. An enthusiastic reaction to the first pulse is not enough to settle how it works across repeated encounters.
Leave room to turn the effect down
Insomniac's accessibility documentation lists Experiential, Functional and Off vibration settings, along with overall vibration intensity. Functional limits vibration to useful gameplay cues, while Off disables it. The documentation separately lists controller-speaker controls.
For the proposed repair game, keep the reward and its visible confirmation available with vibration disabled. Let participants choose a comfortable setting before comparing versions. If someone prefers no vibration, that is a valid result, not a failed appreciation of the effect.
There is no universal pulse strength that can be inferred from the developer's account. Hardware, event frequency and individual preference all remain part of the design problem.
The practical lesson from Rift Apart is modest: review the small actions that fill the space between big scenes. A tiny response, tied to an actual pickup and comfortable to repeat, may contribute more to everyday game feel than another layer of spectacle. Test that possibility in a short sequence before extending it across the whole game.
Top comments (0)