DEV Community

Cover image for Supabase vs. Firebase — Which Backend in 2026?
Joske Vermeulen
Joske Vermeulen

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at aimadetools.com

Supabase vs. Firebase — Which Backend in 2026?

Supabase if you want SQL, open source, and low vendor lock-in.
Firebase if you want the Google ecosystem, real-time by default, and mobile-first features.

Side-by-side

Supabase Firebase
Database PostgreSQL (SQL) Firestore (NoSQL)
Open source Yes No
Self-hostable Yes No
Auth Yes (email, OAuth, magic link) Yes (email, OAuth, phone)
Storage Yes Yes
Real-time Yes (Postgres changes) Yes (built into Firestore)
Functions Edge Functions (Deno) Cloud Functions (Node.js)
Querying Full SQL, joins, aggregates Limited NoSQL queries
Vendor lock-in Low (it's just Postgres) High
Free tier Generous (500 MB DB) Generous
Push notifications No Yes (FCM)
Analytics No Yes (built-in)

Where Supabase wins

  • PostgreSQL — full SQL power. Joins, aggregates, CTEs, window functions. Firestore can't do any of this.
  • Open source — you can self-host. Your data is in a standard PostgreSQL database you can take anywhere.
  • No vendor lock-in — if you leave Supabase, you have a Postgres database. If you leave Firebase, you have a migration nightmare.
  • Row-level security — powerful auth policies at the database level.
  • Developer experience — the dashboard, docs, and client library are excellent.

Where Firebase wins

  • Real-time — Firestore is real-time by default. Every query can be a live subscription. Supabase has real-time but it's not as seamless.
  • Mobile — Firebase was built for mobile. Push notifications (FCM), crash reporting (Crashlytics), analytics, remote config — all built in.
  • Google ecosystem — tight integration with Google Cloud, Google Analytics, BigQuery.
  • Maturity — Firebase has been around since 2012. More battle-tested at massive scale.
  • Offline support — Firestore has excellent offline persistence for mobile apps.

Pricing comparison

Both have generous free tiers. The pricing models differ:

  • Supabase — predictable monthly pricing based on database size and compute
  • Firebase — pay-per-read/write/delete. Can get expensive with lots of reads (and Firestore encourages denormalized data = more reads)

Firebase's pricing is harder to predict. Many developers have been surprised by unexpected bills.

How to choose

  • Building a web app? Supabase (SQL is more natural for web).
  • Building a mobile app? Firebase (push notifications, offline, analytics).
  • Care about vendor lock-in? Supabase (open source, standard Postgres).
  • Need complex queries? Supabase (SQL vs. NoSQL is no contest here).
  • Need real-time everything? Firebase (more mature real-time).
  • Team already knows SQL? Supabase.
  • Team already knows Firebase? Stay with Firebase.

See also: What is Supabase? | PostgreSQL cheat sheet


🛠️ Free tools related to this article:


Originally published at https://www.aimadetools.com

Top comments (0)