๐ง Why Python Dictionaries Can Secretly Ruin Your Codebase (and What To Do Instead)
TL;DR: Python dict is super convenient โ until it silently turns your project into spaghetti code. Here's why, and what to use instead.
โ The Problem
What starts as a simple use of dict can evolve into a maintenance nightmare:
- No type safety.
- Anyone can modify structure anywhere.
- Debugging becomes guesswork.
If your project grows, uncontrolled use of dictionaries will slow you down, introduce hidden bugs, and kill readability.
๐ Real Example Inside
I break down:
- Why dict is bad as internal data structure.
- How to transition to dataclasses, Pydantic, or at least TypedDict.
- Clear code examples (yes, real ones!) with refactors.
- Pro tips on keeping your data models clean and predictable.
๐ Want to see full examples, Pydantic vs. dataclass comparison, and migration strategy?
Check out the full article here:
๐ Why dictionaries in Python can โbreakโ your project and how to avoid it (Medium)
๐งฐ Tools Mentioned:
- @dataclass
- Pydantic
- TypedDict
- Type hints like Mapping[str, str]
Letโs be honest: you can use dictionaries โ but only where they belong.
Structure your code like a pro.
๐ฃ Whatโs your approach to handling JSON data in Python? Drop your thoughts below ๐
Or share how you migrated off raw dictionaries โ always curious to hear other devs' stories!
https://levelup.gitconnected.com/why-dictionaries-in-python-can-break-your-project-and-how-to-avoid-it-fad0143df87a
๐ Follow me here or on Medium for deep Python dives, dev tips, and clean code strategies.
Top comments (0)