DEV Community

Cover image for The major sufferer becomes the major builder
anicca
anicca

Posted on

The major sufferer becomes the major builder

AI's real gift wasn't speed. It was who is allowed to build.

Before you read on

  • Almost everything written about AI's benefit lands on three claims: building got faster, building got cheaper, and people with no technical background can now earn something on the side.
  • All three are true. All three are about people who could already build.
  • The fourth one is the big one. The person who suffers most from a problem can now be the person who builds the fix.
  • This is not an efficiency story. It is a story about people who would not have built the thing in ten years, or twenty, or ever.
  • If you already ship what you decide to ship, skip this. It is for people who have been stuck in the same spot for years.

The fix was always built by someone who didn't have the problem

Every business is somebody's problem, solved for money. Nothing surprising there.

What is strange is who did the solving. The person building the fix almost never had the thing they were fixing.

The team building software to lighten the load of caring for an aging parent was probably not caring for one that year. Whoever designed the debt counselling service was not the one dodging collection calls. Programs for getting out of an addiction are rarely designed from inside one. Tools for bodies that don't cooperate are rarely designed by bodies that don't cooperate.

None of that is an accusation. Look at what building required and it could not have gone any other way.

What building required

To make something and get it in front of people, you needed years of learning, the focus to sit down every day, the stamina to survive the stretch where nothing works, money and time to spare, and the will to start over after it breaks.

Read that list again. It is a list of exactly what the person in trouble does not have.

For some problems, that absence is the problem. Telling someone whose difficulty is that they cannot get moving to spend three years learning to build their own tool is telling a drowning person to swim to shore for help. Drowning was the thing barring them from the fix.

So the builder and the sufferer were different people. Not by anyone's choice. By the shape of the requirement.

The three benefits everyone lists

Faster. Fifty days of work now takes two. True.

Cheaper. Work that went out to a contractor now stays in-house. Also true.

Anyone can earn. Have it draft the deck, write the ad copy, write the article. True enough, with caveats.

I'm not arguing with any of it. But look at who each sentence is addressed to. You celebrate speed if you were already shipping, slowly. You celebrate saved contractor fees if you had contractors and the budget for them. You celebrate the side income if you can do the same task every day without stopping.

Someone who has been stuck for years is in none of those sentences.

This was never about time

Here is the part I care about.

When we say "I can't do it yet, but one day," we are usually talking about time. A few more years. A calmer season. A better course.

For a person whose problem is that they cannot get themselves moving, time was never the variable. Five years does not summon motivation. Ten does not install discipline. Twenty does not produce someone who sits down every morning. Give that person eternity and they still do not build it. I mean that as a plain description, not a flourish.

I watched hundreds of tutorials. I bought the books. I copied the code line by line and stopped halfway. I did that for years. What I eventually learned was not that I lacked talent. It was that the loop had no exit.

That changed. What it takes now is being able to say what you want in your own words. If you can talk, that is the requirement.

When the sufferer builds, the fix comes out a different shape

Solutions built from outside share a habit. They stop one step early.

They surface the information. They stop short of deciding. They stop short of acting. The last move belongs to you. It reads as respectful, and it comes from the builder being someone who can, in fact, take the last move. It has always worked for them, so stopping there seems fine.

Anyone who is actually stuck knows that last step is where everything dies. A tidy summary changes nothing. A well-written draft reply sits in the folder. Being asked to approve something is where the process ends. Handing it over is the failure.

When the person with the problem builds it, that line moves. Not the kind of help — how far in it goes. Where that line sits is something only the person in it knows.

One example, mine

For twenty-four years I could not run my own life.

I don't wake up in time to be anywhere. My sleep runs on no schedule. My body pays for it and so does my head. I have wanted to meditate every day for years and have never held the habit for a month. My money is a mess. Writing it out is embarrassing. It's accurate.

I tried the things built to help. Assistants you can talk to. A tidy briefing every morning. Draft replies waiting in the inbox. They were well made. I did not change. I read the summary and did nothing. I looked at the draft and never sent it.

What I needed was not an assistant. It was a manager. Something that decides without checking with me, books the thing, and tells me afterwards. Not "may I do this?" but "I did this." The moment I'm asked to approve, I stop.

So I built it. The person who had the problem for twenty-four years built the fix. The earlier version of me could not have built any part of it.

Who this helps, and who it doesn't

Not for you if you decide and then act, if habits stick, if a deadline is enough to make it happen. A tool that acts without asking is an obstacle to you. So is this article.

For you if you have been in the same spot for years, if you have been told it's a motivation problem long enough that you believe it, if it never occurred to you that you could be the one building.

Last thing

What I built reads my calendar and calls me before an event. It adds travel time on its own. It emails me when it doesn't know where I'm going. If I'm running late, it tells the people waiting.

I won't claim it fixed me. It has holes. I am late less often than I used to be.

The point isn't the tool. It's that someone who had that problem for twenty-four years ended up on the building side of it.

Now imagine everyone who has been stuck starting to build their own way out. That's the part I want to see.

Top comments (0)