The rise of digital health has changed the way people traditionally access medicines and primary wellness products. Customers no longer visit the brick-and-mortar medicine shops, which is a huge second revenue stream for pharmacies; these days, medicines are directly ordered from pharmacy delivery apps on their smartphones. So, this is where startups find a lucrative business opportunity and a demand for the medicine ordering app development.
However, choosing between the various business models available remains a critical step often not considered by app developers. And the choice of your model determines how your app earns income, executes its daily operations, and pulls in consumers. This article will mention the most common on-demand pharmacy app models and help determine which is better for the startup.
Why On-Demand Pharmacy Apps Are Growing
The healthcare sector has been largely moving towards a digital transformation. Several reasons are fueling the rapid growth of pharmacy delivery apps:
- Convenience First: Delivery of medicines to the doorstep of the customer without them having to step out of their house.
- Better Access: There is typically a lack of very well-established pharmacies in rural and semi-urban locations, and they fill the gap.
- Data-Driven Care: Apps, along with smart technologies, assist users in keeping track of orders, prescriptions, and reminders.
- Post-Pandemic Habits: COVID-19 gave a push to contactless deliveries, and the habit is here to stay.
Market reports indicate that by the end of this decade, the global online pharmacy industry will be valued in the hundreds of billions. So, with more and more people hanging on to mobile applications for their daily needs, a startup's chances to thrive increase when it has set a strong foundation. And that foundation begins with the business model under consideration.
Features Every Pharmacy Delivery App Must Include
Some features are almost compulsory for implementation regardless of the choice of models that are currently in demand.
- Easy onboarding and simple interface.
- Prescription upload with verification.
- Search and filter medicines by category and brand.
- Order tracking and delivery updates.
- Multiple ways of payment.
- Push notifications for dosage reminders and promotions.
- Secure data storage for keeping patient information safe.
In a bid to ensure the smooth functioning of these features, start-ups often hire mobile app developers specializing in healthcare solutions who are familiar with digital healthcare compliance rules; this would help stave off any errors and, from the very beginning, provide the end-user with a smooth experience.
Common On-Demand Pharmacy App Models
*1. Inventory-Led Model
*
Here, the startup owns the inventory, that is, it keeps stock of medicines and healthcare products by itself. This company goes to guarantee partnerships with drug manufacturers and fulfillment of all orders.
How it works:
Medicines bought in bulk.
Stock is stored in warehouses owned by the company.
Orders are fulfilled from the warehouse to the customer.
Pros:
Better control over stock and product quality.
Higher profit margins since bulk buying reduces the cost.
Transparent pricing and consistency.
Cons:
Large capital investment.
Logistics, cold chains, and delivery requirements lead to very high operational costs.
Stringent regulations are applied in the context of medicines and drugs.
Best for: Startups that are strong financially and would like to maintain control over the supply chain with a strong hand.
*2. Aggregator Model
*
This is one of the trending ones among startups, as it ensures that the inventory investment remains low. Instead of stocking medicines and wholesaling them, the aggregator will provide a web platform for customers to connect with local pharmacy stores.
How it works:
Local pharmacies now list products on the platform.
Customers find their wares and place orders.
Pharmacies or shipment vendors deliver the goods.
Pros:
Less capital-intensive than inventory-led setups.
Customers are presented with extensive options and real-time stock status.
It can also be scaled up very quickly with the support of more pharmacies.
Cons:
Limited control over price setting and quality of service.
Commission-based income tends to have low-profit margins.
Third-party pharmacies are chosen at their own discretion.
Best for: Early-stage startups eager to enter the market as fast as possible with minimum investment.
*3. Marketplace Model
*
Inside the hubs of dynamism lies the Marketplace Model, meaning this is a model slightly more advanced than the aggregator. The app itself operates as a large online pharmacy base on which assortments of pharmacies or customers can interact. Unlike in the case of an aggregator, the marketplace might sometimes deliver by itself to ensure greater reliability.
How it works:
Pharmacies register into the portal.
Customers make orders through the app.
Delivery is done partially by the pharmacies and partially through the app's logistics.
Pros:
More credible messengers, as delivery standards are controlled by the app.
Flexibility for users and the pharmacies.
Can charge commissions and delivery fees.
Cons:
High operational costs to manage delivering partners.
Less control than if owning the inventory.
Best for: Startups that want to build an even model between scalability and customer trust.
*4. Subscription Model
*
Unlike one-off drug sales, this model works on a subscription basis. It is especially useful for customers who have to take medicines for recurring conditions like diabetes and hypertension.
How it works:
Customers subscribe to medicines for a definite period (whether weekly, monthly, etc.).
The app guarantees automatic and punctual medicine deliveries.
Typically, subscription holders get discounts or loyalty benefits.
Pros:
Predictable revenues for startups.
Greater customer loyalty and retention.
An easy route for people who need medicine dispensary refills.
Cons:
Very limited in magnitude to some consumer segments (really sick/chronic illnesses).
More restrictive than the flexible models.
A complex reminder-and-tracking system has to be employed.
Best for: Startups catering to niche audiences-those who are elderly or have prescribed medicines for long-term use.
*5. Hybrid Model
*
These are combinations of two or more models that allow one app a very tiny inventory space from which it can sell high-demand medicines or allow it to be connected to local pharmacies for a larger assortment.
How it works:
Fast-moving drugs or core drugs are stored in warehouses.
Other items are supplied from partner pharmacies.
Pros:
Strikes a balance between cost and customer service.
Ensures quick delivery for some medicines.
More ways of earning income.
Cons:
Requires efficient management of two systems.
It may be complex to put in place.
Best for: mid-level startups that seek a scalable arrangement without the full-scale burden of an inventory option.
Key Factors to Consider Before Choosing a Model
Choosing a model for the on-demand pharmacy app is not merely a resource game. Here are points to consider for any startup:
- Target Market: Is the focus on urban metros or on rural regions? Different demographic groups demand different modes of delivery.
- Capital Investment: Do you have funds for infrastructure, or do you want to go with lean models such as aggregators?
- Regulatory Compliance: Delivery of medicine is a highly regulated activity; ensure your model is in line with healthcare laws.
- Customer Base: They differ greatly among chronic patients, occasional buyers, and emergency pack users.
- Technology Stack: A solid app must allow prescription uploads, send reminders for dosage, and allow payments via multiple avenues.
Start-ups with less technical ability seek mobile development companies to get their projects done; a trustworthy service partner like Octal IT Solution would help design an efficient architecture and design for long-term consideration.
*Final Thoughts
*
The demand for on-demand pharmacy apps has only been growing, but the key to success for a new startup lies in choosing the right model. An inventory-led model provides for full control but requires funding; an aggregator, on the other hand, is cheap to scale but the control is limited; a subscription model encourages loyalty but is niche-specific; finally, the hybrid model provides the most flexibility but the greatest complexity.
The evident platform in question will depend on the resource base of the startup, the target customers themselves, and developmental targets. After selection of the apt model, the very next screen involves building a very operational pharmaceutical application, leveraged by some sturdy custom mobile application development services. With the right planning, best technology choices, and adept app developers, your newer pharmacy app could turn out to be a must-have in modern healthcare.
Top comments (0)