I have lost deals on price. I have also won deals where my proposal was the most expensive one on the table, sometimes by a wide margin. Over the years, as a partner helping a software consulting company grow roughly tenfold in under three years, and later as the founder of a fully remote consultancy, I came to a conclusion that surprises a lot of first-time founders: in professional services, the cheapest bid usually loses. Not always on the day the contract is signed, but almost always over the life of the engagement.
This article is about why that happens, and how to price your services so that you win the right work for the right reasons.
The Buyer Is Not Buying Hours
When a company hires a services firm, it rarely wants hours. It wants an outcome: a product shipped, a system modernized, a team unblocked, a risk removed. Hours are just the unit we use to measure effort, and effort is the part of the deal the client cares about least.
If you price as if hours are the product, you invite the buyer to compare you to everyone else who sells hours. At that point the conversation becomes a spreadsheet exercise, and the lowest number wins the spreadsheet. But the buyer who chooses based on the spreadsheet is also the buyer most likely to be disappointed, because the spreadsheet never captured what they actually needed.
The first lesson I learned is simple. Stop describing what you will do and start describing what will be different when you are done. The more clearly you can connect your work to the outcome, the less your price looks like a cost and the more it looks like an investment.
Why Low Bids Fail in Practice
A low bid is almost always low for one of a few reasons, and none of them are good for the client.
First, the bidder may have misunderstood the scope. They are pricing a simpler project than the one the client actually has. The gap shows up later as change orders, missed deadlines or quiet corner cutting.
Second, the bidder may be staffing the work with less experienced people. That can be fine for well defined tasks, but most valuable engagements involve ambiguity, and ambiguity is where experience pays for itself many times over.
Third, the bidder may be buying the deal. They plan to make up the margin later, either through extensions or by raising rates once the client is dependent on them.
Fourth, the bidder may simply not know their own costs. Underpriced firms often do not survive long enough to finish the relationship, and a client whose vendor disappears halfway through a project pays far more than the original savings.
When I explain these dynamics to a buyer, I am not attacking competitors. I am helping the buyer evaluate risk.
Price Is a Signal
Price communicates something before your team ever writes a line of code or sits in a workshop. A price that is far below the market tells the buyer that you either do not value your work or do not understand the problem. A confident, well reasoned price tells them you have done this before and you know what it takes.
I have seen prospects hesitate when a number came in too low. They wondered what they were missing. Conversely, a higher price backed by a clear plan, named roles, defined milestones and honest risk assessment often reassures a buyer that they are in capable hands.
This does not mean you should inflate prices to look premium. It means your price should be consistent with the story you are telling. If you claim to be senior, careful and accountable, your price must leave room for senior, careful and accountable people to do the work.
Building a Pricing Model That Holds Up
Here is the approach I have come to rely on when shaping proposals.
Start with the outcome and the value at stake. Before talking numbers, understand what success is worth to the client and what failure would cost. You do not need precise figures, but you need a sense of scale. A project that protects a major revenue stream deserves a different conversation than a nice-to-have internal tool.
Know your true cost of delivery. That includes salaries and contractor rates, but also management time, recruiting, onboarding, tooling, bench time and the inevitable rework. Many services firms underprice because they only count the obvious costs. Margin is what funds training, hiring ahead of demand and the occasional project that goes sideways.
Offer options rather than a single number. I like to present two or three structured choices: a focused scope, a recommended scope and an expanded scope. Options change the question from "should we hire this firm" to "which version of this firm's plan fits us best." They also reveal what the client values most.
Be explicit about assumptions and risks. A proposal that names the risks and explains how you will manage them is far more persuasive than one that pretends everything will go perfectly. It also protects you when reality shifts.
Tie payments to progress where it makes sense. Milestones give the buyer confidence and give you predictable cash flow. They also keep both sides focused on outcomes rather than hours.
Handling the Price Objection
Every services leader hears it: "Your competitor is cheaper." I do not treat this as a negotiation tactic to fight. I treat it as a request for help.
My first move is to ask questions. What exactly is included in the other proposal? Who will do the work? What happens if the timeline slips? Often the buyer realizes on their own that they are comparing different things.
My second move is to revisit scope rather than rate. If the budget is genuinely fixed, I would rather deliver a smaller scope well than a larger scope poorly. Cutting rate without cutting scope teaches the client that your prices were padded, and it sets up the team to fail.
My third move, when necessary, is to walk away. This is hard, especially when you are growing and every deal feels important. But some of the most expensive engagements I have seen were the ones that should never have been signed. A client who chose you only because you were cheapest will leave you the moment someone cheaper appears, and in the meantime they will often be the most demanding account you have.
Discounting Carefully
Discounts are not evil, but they should be deliberate. I am comfortable offering better terms in exchange for something of value: a longer commitment, faster payment, a case study opportunity if the client is willing, or a larger initial scope. A discount that buys nothing is just lost margin.
I also learned to be careful about how discounts are framed. A temporary concession for a pilot is very different from a permanent rate cut. If you discount, write down exactly what it applies to and when it ends.
Pricing and Growth
When I look back on periods of rapid growth, pricing discipline was one of the quiet engines behind it. Healthy margins let us hire ahead of demand, invest in managers, improve our recruiting and absorb the occasional mistake without panic. Firms that win on price often find themselves stuck: busy, but unable to invest in the very things that would let them grow.
Pricing also shapes your culture. When your team knows the firm charges fairly for real value, they take ownership of delivering that value. When they know the deal was won by underbidding, they feel the squeeze from the first day.
The Real Competitive Advantage
The cheapest bid loses because buyers eventually learn that price was never the real question. The real question is whether this partner will deliver the outcome, communicate honestly and stand behind the work. Your pricing should make that answer obvious.
If you are building or scaling a services business, resist the urge to compete on price. Compete on clarity, confidence and results. Price your work so that you can do it well, explain why, and let the right clients choose you for the right reasons.
I took a firm from $6M to $60M in under three years.
If you want help sharpening how your firm prices, positions and sells its services, visit https://tdzpro.com.
Ashkan
Top comments (0)