I suspect that this could have to do with how the threads, pool size, and process multiply against each other if you're using Puma, or generally be in this veign... Maybe look into the knobs you can pull with Puma? (Or whichever server you're running?)
Hey Ben, thanks for the reply! I poked at the thread issue, but we're not using sidekiq or any asynchronous workers, and we're not using any custom threading. Everything "should be" synchronous to our web instances?
We are using puma, and I'll take a further look into the puma knobs I can play with!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I'm familiar with this, but I forget exactly the path going down to deal with it, so I'll throw some stuff out.
This post seems like an interesting analysis: Is there anything in this post you haven't considered yet?
Active Record, Sidekiq, pools and threads
appaloosa.io ・ Feb 7 '19 ・ 5 min read
I suspect that this could have to do with how the threads, pool size, and process multiply against each other if you're using Puma, or generally be in this veign... Maybe look into the knobs you can pull with Puma? (Or whichever server you're running?)
speedshop.co/2017/10/12/appserver....
Hey Ben, thanks for the reply! I poked at the thread issue, but we're not using sidekiq or any asynchronous workers, and we're not using any custom threading. Everything "should be" synchronous to our web instances?
We are using puma, and I'll take a further look into the puma knobs I can play with!