That works when you modify the code, not when you rename your wiki pages...
I'll probably start documenting in a wiki and link to it. If I find any better ideas, I'll probably write about them on this site.
Well at that point I feel like it's like a failed test. Somebody has to go deal with it and replace the link or remove it. The analyzer's job was only to flag it. This isn't to say that this marries well with the GitHub Wiki as the destination, but that's how these two things would combine.
Another possibility altogether, could be to have documentation actually hosted within code or something and you could verify presence and possible correction the way you would test code. Given sufficient abstraction, this is not too different from verifying 404s though I think.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
With the fear of adding too much complexity, seems like checking for dead links could probably be done via some sort of static analysis.
That works when you modify the code, not when you rename your wiki pages...
I'll probably start documenting in a wiki and link to it. If I find any better ideas, I'll probably write about them on this site.
Well I was thinking maybe the analyzer could find the links and try test them for 404s.
But what do you do when you find them, if the link is already dead?
Well at that point I feel like it's like a failed test. Somebody has to go deal with it and replace the link or remove it. The analyzer's job was only to flag it. This isn't to say that this marries well with the GitHub Wiki as the destination, but that's how these two things would combine.
Another possibility altogether, could be to have documentation actually hosted within code or something and you could verify presence and possible correction the way you would test code. Given sufficient abstraction, this is not too different from verifying 404s though I think.