Most Polymarket trading bots generate a simple signal:
TWAP > Strike → Buy UP
TWAP < Strike → Buy DOWN
But what if instead of generating a signal, we could estimate the actual probability of each outcome?
That is the idea behind a probability-driven Polymarket Trading bot.
Instead of asking:
"Should I buy UP?"
we ask:
"What is the probability that UP wins, and is the market price too cheap?"
The architecture becomes:
TWAP
+
Spot Price
+
Momentum
+
Volatility
+
Time Remaining
↓
Probability Model
↓
P(UP) = 73%
↓
Compare With Market
↓
Edge = Probability - Price
↓
Trade
1. From Signals to Probability
Suppose our model calculates:
P(UP) = 0.73
This means the model estimates a 73% probability that UP will win.
But Polymarket currently offers the UP token at:
$0.61
We can calculate:
edge = model_probability - market_price
Therefore:
edge = 0.73 - 0.61
Result:
Edge = +0.12
The model believes the outcome is worth approximately $0.73, while the market is offering it for $0.61.
That difference is the potential trading opportunity.
2. Why This Is Better Than a Simple Indicator
Consider a traditional strategy:
if twap > strike:
buy_up()
It treats every bullish situation almost identically.
But these two situations are very different:
TWAP slightly above strike
P(UP) ≈ 52%
and:
TWAP significantly above strike
P(UP) ≈ 78%
A probability model allows the bot to understand the strength of the situation.
More importantly, it can compare that probability with the actual market price.
For example:
Model P(UP) = 0.55
Market = 0.54
Edge = +0.01
Probably not attractive.
But:
Model P(UP) = 0.73
Market = 0.61
Edge = +0.12
is much more interesting.
3. What Goes Into the Probability Model?
We don't want to rely on TWAP alone.
The model can combine several features:
TWAP distance from strike
Spot/TWAP difference
Short-term momentum
Realized volatility
Time remaining
Order-book imbalance
For example:
features = {
"twap_distance": twap_distance,
"spot_twap_gap": spot_twap_gap,
"return_10s": return_10s,
"return_30s": return_30s,
"return_60s": return_60s,
"volatility": volatility,
"time_remaining": time_remaining,
"obi": orderbook_imbalance,
}
These features are passed into a probability model.
4. A Simple Probability Model
A good starting point is logistic regression.
It is simple, fast, and produces a probability between 0 and 1.
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
model = LogisticRegression()
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
Then we can calculate the current probability:
p_up = model.predict_proba(
X_current
)[0][1]
For example:
p_up = 0.73
Then:
p_down = 1 - p_up
So:
P(UP) = 73%
P(DOWN) = 27%
5. Training the Model
The training dataset should contain historical market states.
For example:
| TWAP Distance | Momentum | Volatility | Time Left | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.0012 | +0.0003 | 0.0011 | 240s | UP |
| -0.0008 | -0.0004 | 0.0013 | 180s | DOWN |
| +0.0021 | +0.0008 | 0.0015 | 60s | UP |
The target is simple:
UP → 1
DOWN → 0
The model learns how these features relate to the eventual outcome.
Important: Avoid Look-Ahead Bias
Only use information that was available at the time of prediction.
You cannot use future TWAP values, future prices, or the final market outcome as model inputs.
Otherwise, your backtest will be unrealistic.
6. Probability Is Not the Same as Profit
This is one of the most important concepts.
Suppose:
Model P(UP) = 75%
Market price = $0.74
The model may be correct that UP is more likely.
But:
Edge = 0.75 - 0.74
= 0.01
After fees and slippage, that may not be profitable.
Therefore, the bot should not trade every positive edge.
Instead:
net_edge = (
model_probability
- execution_price
- estimated_costs
)
if net_edge > MIN_EDGE:
buy_up()
For example:
Model probability = 0.75
Execution price = 0.62
Estimated costs = 0.02
Net edge = 0.11
If the minimum required edge is 5%:
11% > 5%
The bot can consider entering.
7. Use the Executable Price
One important implementation detail is that you should not blindly compare the model probability with the last traded price.
If you want to buy UP, you care about the price you can actually purchase at.
For example:
Model P(UP) = 0.73
Last price = 0.61
Best ask = 0.64
The realistic calculation is closer to:
0.73 - 0.64 = 0.09
not:
0.73 - 0.61 = 0.12
This makes the strategy much more realistic.
8. Trading Logic
The core strategy can be surprisingly simple:
def trading_decision(p_up, up_price, down_price):
p_down = 1 - p_up
edge_up = p_up - up_price
edge_down = p_down - down_price
if edge_up > MIN_EDGE and edge_up > edge_down:
return "BUY_UP"
if edge_down > MIN_EDGE and edge_down > edge_up:
return "BUY_DOWN"
return "NO_TRADE"
The bot has three possible decisions:
BUY_UP
BUY_DOWN
NO_TRADE
That last one is extremely important.
A good trading bot should be comfortable doing nothing when the market is fairly priced.
9. Backtesting the Strategy
Before using real money, test the model on historical data.
For every historical timestamp:
1. Calculate features
2. Generate probability
3. Get historical market price
4. Calculate edge
5. Apply trading rules
6. Simulate execution
7. Record PnL
Don't only measure total profit.
Also examine:
Win rate
Average edge
Maximum drawdown
Profit factor
Fees
Slippage
Number of trades
PnL by probability range
One particularly useful test is calibration.
If the model predicts:
P(UP) ≈ 70%
then UP should occur roughly 70% of the time among similar predictions.
If the model consistently predicts 70% but UP only wins 55% of the time, the probability estimates are unreliable.
10. The Complete Architecture
The entire strategy can be summarized as:
Market Data
│
┌─────────┴─────────┐
│ │
TWAP Spot Price
│ │
└─────────┬─────────┘
↓
Features
↓
Probability Model
↓
P(UP) = 73%
↓
Market Price
↓
Edge = 12%
↓
Cost Adjustment
↓
Risk Management
↓
EXECUTE
This is a major architectural improvement over:
Indicator → Buy
The bot is now doing:
Features
↓
Probability
↓
Market Price
↓
Edge
↓
Risk
↓
Trade
Conclusion
A simple Polymarket Trading bot tries to predict direction.
A probability-driven bot goes one step further.
It estimates:
P(UP)
P(DOWN)
and compares those probabilities with the prices available in the market.
The core idea is:
edge = model_probability - market_price
Then trade only when the net edge is large enough to justify the costs and risk.
The most important part isn't using the most complicated machine-learning model.
It's building a probability model that is:
- Well-trained
- Properly calibrated
- Tested on unseen data
- Resistant to overfitting
- Combined with realistic execution costs
Once you have that foundation, you can start building much more advanced prediction-market systems.
Instead of simply asking:
"Where is the market going?"
your bot starts asking:
"What is this outcome actually worth, and is the market pricing it incorrectly?"
That is the foundation of probability-driven prediction-market trading.
Bot profit screenshot
🤝 Collaboration & Contact
If you’re interested in building trading bots, buy trading bots, collaborating, exploring strategy improvements, or discussing about this system, feel free to reach out.
I’m especially open to connecting with:
Quant traders
Engineers building trading infrastructure
Researchers in prediction markets
Investors interested in market inefficiencies
📌 GitHub Repository
This repo has some Polymarket several bots in this system.
You can explore the full implementation, strategy logic, and ongoing updates about 5 min crypto market here:
Benjam1nCup
/
Polymarket-trading-bot-python-V2
polymarket trading bot polymarket bot polymarket twap bot polymarket arbitrage bot polymarket trading bot polymarket bot polymarket twap bot polymarket arbitrage bot polymarket trading bot polymarket bot polymarket twap bot polymarket arbitrage bot polymarket trading bot polymarket bot polymarket twap bot polymarket arbitrage bot polymarket bot
Polymarket Trading Bot | Polymarket Arbitrage Bot | Polymarket TWAP Trading Bot
An open-source and Strong Strategy collection of Polymarket trading bot and Polymarket arbitrage bot and Polymarket TWAP trading bot in Python for high-performance automated trading on polymarket crypto 5min and 15min markets.
Features
-
Explosive growth of Polymarket with surging trading volume and new short-term markets
-
Increasing dominance of automated bots and AI in 5-minute and 15-minute crypto prediction markets
-
Higher profitability potential through advanced arbitrage and market-making strategies
-
Stronger edge for Python-based bots with real-time orderbook intelligence and low-latency execution
-
Continuous evolution of sniper, ladder, stair, momentum, and copy trading strategies
-
Scalable daily profits as prediction markets move toward hundreds of billions in annual volume
-
Full future-proof architecture for new features, contracts, and high-frequency trading environments
Included Trading Bots
Designed for arbitrage, directional strategies, and ultra-short-term markets (including 5-minute and 15-minute rounds), this bot framework provides a robust…
💬 Get in Touch
If you have ideas, questions, or would like to collaborate or want these trading bots, don’t hesitate to reach out directly.
Feedback on your repo (based on your description & strategy)
Contact Info
Telegram
https://t.me/BenjaminCup
tags: polymarket,trading,bot,architecture,tutorial,TWAP


Top comments (0)