I expected AI learning to be linear.
Start with basics. Move to intermediate skills. Advance toward mastery. That’s how most skill-building works — and it’s how most AI learning resources are structured.
That’s not how I actually learned.
I learned AI sideways — through detours, repetition, setbacks, and re-encounters with the same concepts from different angles. And once I accepted that, progress finally made sense.
Linear learning assumes stable rules
Linear learning works best when systems behave predictably.
You learn a rule, apply it, and build on top of it. The rules don’t change much, and success compounds neatly.
AI doesn’t operate that way.
Its behavior shifts with context. The same prompt can succeed or fail depending on framing, task type, or hidden assumptions. Progress doesn’t stack cleanly — it loops.
Understanding arrived through revisiting, not advancing
I didn’t “move on” from concepts like prompting, evaluation, or context.
I kept bumping into them again — each time with slightly more understanding.
What changed wasn’t the topic.
It was my perspective.
The same idea made no sense early on, felt obvious later, and became nuanced after that. Learning didn’t move forward. It deepened sideways.
Mistakes connected ideas faster than lessons
Sideways learning is driven by failure.
When outputs broke, I had to trace them backward:
- Was the goal unclear?
- Did context distort the result?
- Was I trusting fluency instead of accuracy?
Each failure connected concepts that tutorials taught separately. The system started to feel coherent — not because I followed a path, but because I kept crossing the same ground from different directions.
Skill developed through overlap, not sequence
My progress didn’t follow levels.
It followed overlap.
Prompting improved because evaluation improved. Evaluation improved because framing improved. Framing improved because I started thinking about consequences.
Everything reinforced everything else — unevenly, messily, but effectively.
Sideways learning built transferable intuition
Because learning wasn’t tied to a sequence, it wasn’t tied to a tool.
I could switch platforms without starting over. Concepts felt familiar even when interfaces changed. I wasn’t memorizing steps — I was recognizing patterns.
That’s what made the skills stick.
Why sideways learning feels uncomfortable — but works
Sideways learning feels inefficient.
There’s no clear progress bar. You revisit the same problems. You feel behind and ahead at the same time.
But that discomfort is a signal that learning is actually happening — not just completion.
This is why learning environments like Coursiv emphasize iterative understanding over linear completion. Because AI skill doesn’t grow in a straight line.
It grows through repetition with awareness.
And once you stop expecting a straight path, you stop mistaking confusion for failure — and start recognizing it as progress.
Top comments (0)