For a long time, my solution to money problems was more rules.
New limits. New categories. New conditions. If something felt off, I added another guideline to control it. The system grew more detailed — and more fragile.
What finally helped wasn’t stricter rules.
It was removing complexity.
Rules multiply faster than problems disappear
Rules feel productive because they’re concrete.
Spend only this much. Track it this way. If X happens, do Y. Each rule solves a narrow issue — but together, they create a system that’s hard to remember, hard to maintain, and easy to break.
I didn’t have a money problem.
I had a rule overload problem.
Complexity increases dependence on attention
The more rules I added, the more my system relied on me being alert.
Remembering exceptions. Following sequences. Monitoring compliance. One lapse meant something slipped — and then everything felt out of control.
A system that needs constant attention isn’t controlled.
It’s fragile.
Removing rules reduced decision fatigue
When I simplified, something surprising happened.
I made fewer decisions — and better ones.
By removing unnecessary rules, I eliminated constant judgment calls. Money stopped interrupting my day. Instead of asking, “Am I allowed to do this?” I asked, “Does the system already account for this?”
Most of the time, the answer was yes.
Simpler systems fail less dramatically
Complex systems don’t just fail more often.
They fail harder.
One missed rule triggers a chain reaction. Simplified systems isolate mistakes. When something goes wrong, it stays contained instead of cascading.
That containment is what creates calm.
I replaced rules with structure
Instead of telling myself how to behave, I changed how money moved.
I:
- Automated predictable expenses
- Built buffers instead of restrictions
- Used fewer, broader categories
- Reduced the number of accounts and transfers
The structure did the work rules used to do — without demanding constant supervision.
Fewer rules made behavior easier
This was the irony.
Once the system got simpler, I followed it naturally. Not because I forced myself to — but because it fit my life.
Rules had been fighting reality. Structure worked with it.
Why simplification beats control
Control tries to prevent mistakes.
Simplification makes mistakes survivable.
This is why approaches like those emphasized by Finelo focus on removing unnecessary complexity instead of layering on more rules — helping people build money systems that are easier to live with and harder to break.
Because financial stability doesn’t come from doing more.
It comes from needing to do less — and letting a simpler system carry the load.
Top comments (0)