DEV Community

Discussion on: Probably the hottest code refactoring you ever saw πŸ”₯

Collapse
 
bsaad profile image
bsaad

Great post, I like how you took the time to explain step by step.

I'd suggest also the following change to make the "business rules" clearer by extracting them from the formatting logic:

const formatMap = {
  uk: ["zip", "suburb", "city", "state"],
  us: ["city", "state", "zip"],
  nz: ["zip", "city", "county", "state"],
  default: ["zip", "suburb", "state", "county"],
}

const formatAddress = (address) => { 
  const format = formatMap[address.countryCode] || formatMap.default;
  return format.map(field => address[field]).filter(Boolean).join(', ');
};
Collapse
 
faezshaeran profile image
Faiz Shahiran

this is nice.. considering formatMap value can be saved in config file or database. Its easier to scale.

Collapse
 
potouridisio profile image
Ioannis Potouridis

Well one way or another the formatAddress function needs to know the business rules. If I went with your approach I would pass the rules as an argument.

Collapse
 
ancientswordrage profile image
AncientSwordRage

This is the final image in a magneto_perfection.jog meme. I love it.

Collapse
 
kamalhm profile image
Kamal

this is also what i like to do whenever a switch case appears

Collapse
 
kelerchian profile image
Alan • Edited

Unless formatMap is something that needs to be dynamic, I suggest not to do this.

This mixes up type and data and also smells like premature abstraction.

Collapse
 
tomazfernandes profile image
Tomaz Lemos

I’d never seen this pattern in JS, looks just as nice as in Java πŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌ

Collapse
 
tomazfernandes profile image
Tomaz Lemos

Actually I’ve just written a post about this kind of pattern, if you’d like to take a look:
dev.to/tomazlemos/keeping-your-cod...

Collapse
 
potouridisio profile image
Ioannis Potouridis

Thanks for sharing this. πŸ™