You're right! I think if the team/company wants to do code reviews, there has to be a process, and everyone should be responsible enough to not forgo it:). Otherwise, they can end up not testing (psst! Can you pretend you tested my feature and it works?), or not working at all (psst! Can you tell our manager I was here today?).
I mean, it might sound like I'm exaggerating, but what's the real difference?
If, on the other hand, they don't want or don't need reviewing at the current stage of the project, for whatever reason, then it should not be mandatory.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
It's cool as long as it's working like you described. I sometimes end up in situations like:
Or asking to improve pending code makes someone feel guilty. But hey, then we probably have far bigger issues than just code reviews.
You're right! I think if the team/company wants to do code reviews, there has to be a process, and everyone should be responsible enough to not forgo it:). Otherwise, they can end up not testing (psst! Can you pretend you tested my feature and it works?), or not working at all (psst! Can you tell our manager I was here today?).
I mean, it might sound like I'm exaggerating, but what's the real difference?
If, on the other hand, they don't want or don't need reviewing at the current stage of the project, for whatever reason, then it should not be mandatory.