DEV Community

s
s

Posted on

1

Answer:

In addition to what visitor said :

The function void emplace_back(Type&& _Val) provided by MSCV10 is non-conforming and redundant because as you noted it is strictly equivalent to push_back(Type&& _Val).

But the real C++0x form of emplace_back is really useful: void emplace_back(Args&&...);

Instead of taking a value_type

Top comments (0)

Postmark Image

Speedy emails, satisfied customers

Are delayed transactional emails costing you user satisfaction? Postmark delivers your emails almost instantly, keeping your customers happy and connected.

Sign up