Answer:

answer re: push_back vs emplace_back

Nov 29 '10

800

In addition to what visitor said :

The function void emplace_back(Type&& _Val) provided by MSCV10 is non-conforming and redundant because as you noted it is strictly equivalent to push_back(Type&& _Val).

But the real C++0x form of emplace_back is really useful: void emplace_back(Args&&...);

Instead of taking a value_type…

Open Full Answer