DEV Community

Cover image for Dockerising a Next.js project
Chris Garrett
Chris Garrett

Posted on

Dockerising a Next.js project

I recently made the switch from Mac to Windows - I won't get into the reasons why, other than to mutter a few grumbles about keyboards. What I will say is that having our projects well Dockerised proved to be invaluable in making the move. Where previously I'd have lost days to getting my dev environment setup, a simple docker-compose up dev worked seamlessly, out of the box.

My dev environment isn't the only area where Docker is valuable, of course. While it may seemingly go against convention, we generally choose to deploy our Next.js apps as Fargate services. I won't get into the many Dev Ops related reasons for this, but I will show you how we use Docker and Docker Compose to run our Next.js apps effectively, across environments...

I'm going to assume you have Docker Desktop installed, know the difference between Docker and Docker Compose, and have a working knowledge of Next.js.

With those prerequisites out of the way, let's start with our Dockerfile:

FROM node:current-alpine AS base
WORKDIR /base
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install
COPY . .

FROM base AS build
ENV NODE_ENV=production
WORKDIR /build
COPY --from=base /base ./
RUN npm run build

FROM node:current-alpine AS production
ENV NODE_ENV=production
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=build /build/package*.json ./
COPY --from=build /build/.next ./.next
COPY --from=build /build/public ./public
RUN npm install next

EXPOSE 3000
CMD npm run start

This may not look like the Dockerfile you were expecting... This is a "multi-stage" Dockerfile, which can be used for both development and production deploys. There are various reasons you may want to do this, but the primary one is that the size of our docker images can be reduced dramatically as they only bundle the result of the final step.

Let's take a look at that first step:

FROM node:current-alpine AS base
WORKDIR /base
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install
COPY . .

This looks more or less like any other node related Dockerfile; it extends from the official node image, copies our package.json and installs it, then adds the working project files.

This next stage is where things get interesting - this is where we compile our next app:

FROM base AS build
ENV NODE_ENV=production
WORKDIR /build
COPY --from=base /base ./
RUN npm run build

Each stage of a multi-stage Dockerfile is self-contained, so we have to explicitly copy any files we want from the base step. This step only relates to a production build, so we're explicitly setting the NODE_ENV to production, copying the files from the base step, and running the build script specified in our package.json.

With our app compiled, we're on to the final step: creating a lean, production-ready image.

FROM node:current-alpine AS production
ENV NODE_ENV=production
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=build /build/package*.json ./
COPY --from=build /build/.next ./.next
COPY --from=build /build/public ./public
RUN npm install next

EXPOSE 3000
CMD npm run start

From the previous build step, we copy our package.json, the .next directory which contains our compiled app, and the directory which contains our public assets across. Finally, it installs the next package, uses it to start our compiled app, and exposes it at localhost:3000. The only files this final image contains are the ones that we copied across - the essentials - keeping it super lean. We've ditched our heavy node_modules directory, among other things.

Note:
You may have noticed I specified ENV NODE_ENV=production again in this step. This is because ENV variables aren't shared between steps, so need to be duplicated.

That's our Dockerfile done; now how do we run next dev with this thing?

Simple: we need a docker-compose.yml file:

version: "3.7"

x-common-props: &common-props
  build:
    context: ./
    target: base
  working_dir: /base
  volumes:
    - ./app:/base
    - node_modules:/base/node_modules

services:
  npm:
    <<: *common-props
    entrypoint: npm
  dev:
    <<: *common-props
    ports:
      - "3000:3000"
    command: npm run dev
volumes:
  node_modules:

This gives me two local services; npm and dev. Both use the base step from our Dockerfile, but:

  • npm specifies the npm command as it's entry point, so I can write convenient commands like docker-compose run npm i -s moment.
  • dev specifies the dev script from our package.json, so I can start the whole thing up with docker-compose up dev and see my app running at localhost:3000.

I have some common-props to share attributes between services, and these include mounting a volume for my node_modules - a useful trick for sharing modules between containers and saving a lot of time.


To sum up: adding these two files to the root of any standard next.js project should have you up and running in no time - with:

  • Out of the box, cross-platform development for your whole team.
  • Blazing fast, fully containerized production deploys.

If you've any reservations about how performant a containerised next.js app, compared to one targetting serverless, I leave you with this timeline from the dynamic, database driven homepage of one of our projects:

Alt Text

Top comments (7)

Collapse
 
mfeltscher profile image
Moreno Feltscher

I love the approach you took in order to ship a minimal image for production! Unfortunately I'm getting the following error when trying to use you example with Next v10.0.5:
Error: > Couldn't find a pages directory. Please create one under the project root

I don't really get why Next isn't just using what's in .next... Do you maybe have any idea what's causing this?

Collapse
 
mfeltscher profile image
Moreno Feltscher

Nevermind, had an issue with running the production app. Fixed it and now your example works like a charm!

Collapse
 
levpa profile image
Lev Pa

Please, share that fix...

Thread Thread
 
mfeltscher profile image
Moreno Feltscher

Well, not as impressive as it might sound but I for some reason ran next instead of next start 🙈

Collapse
 
lenybee profile image
Leny BERNARD

Thank you, it works for dev env but not for prod actually, did you forgot some parts ?
I added a prod config with the production target but the build step failed as SSG (or ISG) needs another service to be hit to fetch data. I've tried adding a "depends_on" docker-compose conf but it doesn't helped and I still have a FetchError getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND...

Collapse
 
leoraba profile image
Leonardo Rivera

Just the command "RUN npm install next" adds >100MB to the image.

Collapse
 
alexp profile image
AlexP

how would this work in a production environment? since it pretty much relies on the image being build on the server