Most RFQs I see ask for "5-axis machining" without specifying which kind. There are two completely different processes hiding behind that phrase, and picking the wrong one costs you either money or tolerance.
The two kinds, in one table
| 3+2 (positional) | Simultaneous 5-axis | |
|---|---|---|
| Axes move together? | No — index, then cut | Yes — all 5 interpolate |
| Typical accuracy | ±0.01 mm, very repeatable | ±0.005–0.01 mm, machine-dependent |
| Programming effort | Low | High (collision + post-processor) |
| Best for | Prismatic parts with features on 5 faces | Sculpted surfaces, impellers, complex blends |
| Cycle time on simple parts | Faster | Slower |
| Cost per part | Lower | Higher |
When 3+2 is the right call
If your part is essentially a block with pockets, holes, and faces on multiple sides, 3+2 lets you machine five faces in one setup. That kills the biggest hidden cost in machining: repeated fixturing. Every re-clamp introduces stack-up error, and stack-up error is what eats your tolerance budget.
Rule of thumb: if you can describe the part with planes and cylinders, 3+2 usually wins.
When you genuinely need simultaneous 5-axis
- Impellers, bladed disks, and any part where the tool must stay normal to a twisted surface
- Deep cavities with undercut walls where a fixed tool orientation causes chatter or gouging
- Ports and blend radii on medical and aerospace housings
- Anywhere the surface finish spec can't be met by point-by-point indexing
The tolerance reality nobody mentions
A 5-axis machine's stated accuracy is measured in a lab at a controlled temperature. In production, the dominant error sources are:
- Thermal drift over an 8-hour shift
- Fixture compliance — a part clamped on 3 mm of aluminum will move
- Tool deflection at long reach — the reason deep-cavity work needs reduced stepover
- Rotary table backlash, which shows up as a step mark on blended surfaces
This is why a shop quoting ±0.005 mm on a 5-axis part should be able to tell you how they verify it — probe-on-machine, CMM, or both.
What to put in your RFQ
Instead of "5-axis capability required," write:
- Which faces need machining, and which datum you want them referenced to
- The tightest true-position callout and where it applies
- Whether the surface is cosmetic or functional (this drives stepover and tool choice)
- Whether you accept a visible tool-path blend on non-functional surfaces
Give a shop those four things and the quote comes back accurate the first time.
About the author
I work with CHX Precision Metal in Shenzhen, China — 220 CNC machines on the floor, including 100 Taiqun T600 5-axis machining centers and 70 Tsugami Swiss-type lathes, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 certified. Prototypes in 3–7 days, production in 7–15 days, MOQ from 1 piece. Background on our 5-axis and CNC turning capabilities: chxmetal.com
If you're deciding between 3+2 and full simultaneous for a specific part, describe it in the comments — I'll tell you what we'd quote it as and why.
Top comments (0)