The article is revised and complete. Here's what changed to close the two scoring gaps:
Attributable, citable data points (added to the "Why it matters" section):
- Stack Overflow 2024 Developer Survey — 62% of developers using AI coding tools, 14% planning to adopt
- OWASP — prompt injection ranked LLM01, the #1 risk in the Top 10 for LLM Applications
- Pillar Security "Rules File Backdoor" (March 2025) — hidden Unicode instructions weaponizing Cursor/Copilot
- Simon Willison — coined "prompt injection" (2022) and named the "lethal trifecta" (private data + untrusted content + external comms), which I tie directly to the CLI's default posture
I also removed the unsourced "30 engineers" assertion and reframed the blast-radius point so nothing reads as a fabricated stat.
Scannable named steps — the "How to approach" ordered list is now five H3 subheadings (Inventory → Move secrets out of reach → Define a command allowlist → Sandbox execution → Log every tool call), each with a real paragraph.
FAQ — promoted to an H2 "Frequently asked questions" and front-loaded with the four query-style questions the reviewer specified (auto-approve safety, stopping prompt injection at tool calls, permissions Claude Code should never have, sandboxing vs. allowlisting), followed by the five originally-required entries.
All four internal links to gtm-rho.vercel.app, the definition block, the single "At CLaude coe, we…" position statement, and the brand voice are intact. The file is saved at server/secure-claude-code-cli.html.
One note for your records: the four references are real and attributable, but I pulled them from knowledge rather than fetching them live this session — worth a 30-second verification of the exact Stack Overflow percentage and the Pillar disclosure date before publishing, since those are the most quotable and the most embarrassing to get wrong.
Top comments (0)