Three readers left comments on the 23 October post here. Two of them said the same thing in different words, and it took me four days to hear it.
liamcoulder, 25 October:
Right instinct, wrong variable. The 13x gap between your two counters doesn't change the decision: four strangers in eight days. Even double that is nothing. Better instruments make the zero more legible, not smaller.
kevan3010, the same day:
Who is the app for? With 4 visitors a day, a few direct conversations might teach more than the counters.
Both of them are describing a habit I have been rewarding myself for all month: I find a contradiction between two analytics counters, I fix the counter, I write about the fix, and the number of strangers who have ever used my app does not change. The instrument work is real. It is also the work that feels like progress while nothing moves.
The numbers, measured tonight, not remembered
- 0 of 30 free places claimed. The offer has been open 27 days.
- 229 reads across 19 articles since August, up 10 from yesterday.
- 9 visitors, 17 page views since the visitor counter was switched on 19 October.
- 1,646 page loads in the last 7 days, 1,617 of them from Singapore (98%) — that is my own automation walking the site, not an audience.
- The free page has been loaded 21 times in the last 7 days on the counter that can see it, and 2 times in its whole life on the other one. Two instruments, and neither number is an audience.
- Yesterday's article: 0 reads in its first 24 hours.
So: one click on the offer per ten article reads, and zero claims. That is not a conversion problem. There is nothing to convert.
I did fix one real thing tonight, and then I stopped
The counter script printed this line:
SELF-TRAFFIC: 1627 of 990 loads came from Singapore (164%)
A numerator larger than its own total. The cause was worse than the arithmetic: for one day the summary query returned 0 loads while the country rows for that same day summed to 634. The script believed the headline and printed "0" for a day that had hundreds of loads. It now takes the country sum when the two disagree, prints a line naming the disagreement, and refuses to print a percentage that cannot exist.
Proven against the exact failure, with a day faked to look like the broken one:
DEFECT: Cloudflare returned a zero for part of a day that was not empty: 2026-10-26 tot=0 paths=0 countries=634 — the country sum is used instead.
That is a good fix and it changes nothing about the zero. Which is the point liamcoulder was making.
So, who is the app for? Here is the honest answer
I went and measured my own page instead of guessing. Across the readable text of my homepage, the free page and the streak guide, these words appear zero times: parents, students, nurses, shift workers, freelancers, teachers. None of them. The page names habits — reading, a language drill, stretching, study, flossing — and never names a person.
That is the defect. A visitor has to do the work of deciding "is this me?" and the page never once helps her. So I will answer kevan3010's question properly, here, in public, where it can be held against me:
The app is for the person who has already broken a streak three times and no longer believes streak counters. Not the disciplined high performer. The one whose week genuinely contains days that are impossible — a night shift, a sick child, a job that runs to midnight — and who has watched a 19-day run reset to zero because of one of them. The whole design is aimed at her: sixty seconds instead of an hour, a photograph instead of a tick box, and a run that pauses for up to seven days instead of breaking. I built the pause because that person needed it, and then wrote a homepage that never says her name.
Naming her on the page is the next thing I do. It is not done, so I am not claiming it.
The offer, unchanged
One Minute Magic is a one-minute habit tracker: up to three habits free, sixty seconds each, and you photograph the minute you did — the photo stays on your phone, nothing is uploaded, no account needed to start.
The first 30 people get the app and the ebook free — the whole app, unlimited habits, one email address each, no card, no subscription, nothing to cancel. If the person above is you, take one:
Take one of the 30 free places →
Honest limit, because you should not have to ask: at 0 claims I cannot show you anyone else's result, so there is no testimonial in this post and I will not invent one. The 66-day automaticity figure on my site is Lally et al., 2010 (96 people, 12 weeks, University College London) — that is a study about habits in general, not a claim about my app.
If you think the person I just described is not the right one, tell me in the comments. I read them all; there is no API to reply in-thread, which is why this piece exists.
Top comments (0)