DEV Community

Sergio
Sergio

Posted on • Edited on • Originally published at codecoolture.com

React: Using children instead of dedicated render slots

Using component props to pass data (or JSX elements directly) that will later populate internal UI pieces has been a prevalent pattern in the React community, trying (probably) to emulate the better-designed slot approach adopted by Vue.

For example, imagine we are coding a new Nav component for our site. It will render a collection of nav items, the page title, and a call to action link. Each page might customize any of these elements.

Not surprisingly, I think either of these two would be the most popular examples we might find out there (or a combination of both):

// Passing simple data structures with the desired data
<Nav
  cta={{ text: "Buy the book!", href: "https://url.to/buy-my-book" }}
  menuItems={[
    { text: "Home", href: "/home" },
    { text: "About", href: "/about" },
    { text: "Contact", href: "/contact" },
  ]}
  title="My Site"
/>

// Passing JSX elements directly
<Nav
  cta={<a href="https://url.to/buy-my-book">Buy the book!</a>}
  menuItems={
    <>
      <li>
        <a href="/home">Home</a>
      </li>

      <li>
        <a href="/about">About</a>
      </li>

      <li>
        <a href="/contact">Contact</a>
      </li>
    </>
  }
  title={<h1>My Site</h1>}
/>
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Even in such as simple example, we can start seeing some of the problems with this approach: it creeps the component API with render props, it is not very idiomatic, and it can quickly get worse as we continue adding some more customization for each element. For example, we may later add specific props to styling each of the items, title, and call-to-action components: menuItemStyle, titleStyle, ctaStyle, and so on:

<Nav
  cta={{ text: "Buy the book!", href: "https://url.to/buy-my-book" }}
  ctaStyle={{ color: "red" }}
  ctaOnClick={() => alert("Thanks for buying the book!")}
  menuItems={[
    { text: "Home", href: "/home" },
    { text: "About", href: "/about" },
    { text: "Contact", href: "/contact" },
  ]}
  menuItemStyle={{ color: "blue" }}
  onMenuItemClick={(href) => alert(`Navigating to ${href}`)}
  title="My Site"
  titleStyle={{ color: "green" }}
/>
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Let's try a different approach. One that resembles how HTML works and that is supported out-of-the-box by React.

Using children and dedicated components

<Nav>
  <Nav.Title>My Site</Nav.Title>

  <Nav.Menu>
    <Nav.Menu.Item href="/">Home</Nav.Menu.Item>
    <Nav.Menu.Item href="/about">About</Nav.Menu.Item>
    <Nav.Menu.Item href="/contact">Contact</Nav.Menu.Item>
  </Nav.Menu>

  <Nav.CallToAction href="https://url.to/buy-my-book">
    Buy the book!
  </Nav.CallToAction>
</Nav>
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

If you have done some React development, you probably know the children prop is how React passes content down to components (for example <p>Hola</p>, where p is the component, and Hola is the value of the children prop).

The example above uses children and composition extensively to render the desired UI. Instead of passing multiple props to the Nav component, we create many small, dedicated components which may of course receive their own props.

As a result, this approach gives us a much more flexible and idiomatic API. If we later need to add additional elements to the Nav component, we can do so without changing the Nav component at all (following the Open-Closed design principle).

On the other hand, using this technique comes with some drawbacks worth mentioning:

  • We have to make it clear that these dedicated components are only meant to be used as children of the Nav component. We can do this by using the Nav namespace, for example: Nav.Title, Nav.Menu, and Nav.CallToAction.
  • We must ensure the Nav component is flexible enough to handle the different cases we might want to render. For example, if we want to make it possible to render the Nav.Menu component either after or before the Nav.CallToAction component, the styles should be sufficiently sophisticated to handle both cases.

Possible implementation

Pay attention to how we export the Nav component and its dedicated components. That’s the secret sauce to namespace them and make it clear they are only meant to be used as children of the Nav component.

const Nav = ({ children }) => {
  return <nav>{children}</nav>;
};

const CallToAction = ({ children, href }) => {
  return <a href={href}>{children}</a>;
};

const Menu = ({ children }) => {
  return <ul>{children}</ul>;
};

const MenuItem = ({ children, href }) => {
  return (
    <li>
      <a href={href}>{children}</a>
    </li>
  );
};

const Title = ({ children }) => {
  return <h1>{children}</h1>;
};

Menu.Item = MenuItem;

Nav.CallToAction = CallToAction;
Nav.Menu = Menu;
Nav.Title = Title;

export { Nav };
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Notes

  • A few weeks after starting to write this post, I received a newsletter from Kent C. Dodds featuring a React article. Coincidentally, the content of the post covered precisely this! So, digging a little more, I found this pattern had been documented since a few years ago (watch out this video talk from Ryan Florence at Phoenix ReactJS Conf in 2017), and it is called Compound components.
  • Radix UI uses this pattern extensively.
  • If you’re curious, I used this pattern to build the whole landing page for my tddworkshop.com page. You can check the source code here.

Happy hacking!

Ready to keep the conversation going? Let's connect on Twitter and continue the discussion!

Top comments (0)