nice. for higher order function lovers , we can do the same thing by
const nums = [1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 5, 5, 6, 4, 2, 6]; nums.filter((v,i) => nums.indexOf(v) == i );
numsObject = [{id: 1, name: 'one', {id: 2, name: 'two'}] ?
Like @lukeshiru said, this works but is much slower. O(n^2) vs O(n). It's fine for small arrays, but would be slow as the array gets bigger.
O(n^2)
O(n)
Yup, only thing to consider is that it's slower.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
nice.
for higher order function lovers , we can do the same thing by
numsObject = [{id: 1, name: 'one', {id: 2, name: 'two'}] ?
Like @lukeshiru said, this works but is much slower.
O(n^2)vsO(n). It's fine for small arrays, but would be slow as the array gets bigger.Yup, only thing to consider is that it's slower.