Q: How many tags should we slap on our AWS resources?
A: Look, I've been doing this for years across probably 20+ different companies, and here's what actually works in the real world. Most places that don't hate their lives use around 5-8 mandatory tags - stuff like CostCenter, Environment, Owner, Project, Application. That's your baseline. Then maybe 3-5 more depending on what kind of weird edge cases your business throws at you.
But seriously, don't be that guy who tries to tag literally everything. I worked at one place where they had a 23-tag minimum. Nobody followed it. Half the tags were garbage. The whole thing was a mess. Stick to tags that solve actual problems you're having right now.
Q: What's the difference between cost allocation tags and regular tags anyway?
A: Okay, this confused the hell out of me when I first started. Cost allocation tags are the special ones that show up in your AWS billing reports - but you have to manually activate them in the billing console first. I can't tell you how many times I've seen people create perfect cost tags and then wonder why they don't show up in reports. You literally have to flip a switch.
Regular tags are just for operations - finding stuff, organizing your mess, whatever. Smart move is making your tags do double duty. Why maintain separate systems when you can make one set of tags work for both billing and ops? Less work for everyone.
Q: How do we handle temporary stuff and experiments without screwing up our cost reports?
A: Dude, temporary resources are where cost allocation goes to die if you're not careful. I've seen AWS bills with thousands of dollars in "Unknown" charges because someone spun up a cluster for testing and forgot to tag it properly.
Standard approach: use your normal cost tags, but add ExpirationDate, Purpose, and TemporaryResource=true. Pro tip - set up a Lambda function to nuke resources based on expiration dates. I built one that saved my last company about $3K/month just from forgotten test instances. Worth the afternoon it took to write.
Technical Implementation Reality
Q: Can we really automate 100% of our tagging?
A: Short answer: no, and you'll drive yourself crazy trying. I typically see 80-90% automation in mature environments, and that's pretty damn good. There's always some legacy crap or weird edge case that needs human eyeballs.
Focus your automation on the obvious patterns - anything following standard naming conventions, resources created through CI/CD, that kind of thing. For the weird stuff, just tag it manually and move on with your life. I've watched teams spend months trying to automate tagging for 12 legacy resources they could have tagged by hand in 20 minutes.
Q: Are we gonna hit AWS's 50-tag limit?
A: If you're anywhere close to 50 tags per resource, you're doing something very wrong. I've literally never seen a good tagging strategy that needed more than maybe 15 tags per resource, and that was for some pretty complex multi-tenant stuff.
If you're hitting limits, you've probably got redundant tags or you're trying to store a novel in your metadata. Instead of Team, SubTeam, Function, Project, SubProject, try something like Team-SubTeam-Function. Or better yet, put detailed metadata in your CMDB and keep tags simple.
Q: What happens when we need to change our tag schema later?
A: It's gonna happen, guaranteed. Your business changes, management changes their minds, you realize your original schema was dumb - whatever. I've been through this probably 6 times.
Here's the playbook: run old and new tags in parallel for a transition period (usually 2-3 months), write scripts for bulk updates, communicate the hell out of the timeline, and test everything twice. It's annoying but not the end of the world. Just don't try to do it all at once or you'll break something important.
Money and FinOps
Q: When do we actually see ROI from this tagging investment?
A: You'll see quick wins in 3-6 months - better visibility, faster troubleshooting, fewer "where did this $500 charge come from" Slack messages. Real ROI typically hits around 12-18 months when you can start making smart optimization decisions based on actual data.
First company I implemented proper tagging at, we identified $40K in wasted spend in the first quarter just from better visibility. By month 18, we were saving about $15K/month through better rightsizing and reserved instance planning.
Q: How accurate can cost allocation get with proper tagging?
A: With a decent implementation, you can hit 90-95% accuracy, which is good enough for any reasonable business discussion. That last 5-10% is usually shared stuff - networking, security tools, monitoring infrastructure that supports everyone.
Most places handle shared costs through business rules rather than trying to tag every single load balancer and NAT gateway. Perfect accuracy isn't worth the operational overhead.
Q: Does tagging help with cost optimization beyond just allocation?
A: Hell yes. Once you have solid tagging, you can do some really cool stuff:
Rightsizing becomes way smarter when you can analyze usage patterns by business context. Reserved instance planning gets easier when you understand usage by team or project. You can automate lifecycle management for dev/test environments. Cost anomaly detection actually becomes useful instead of just noisy.
Last place I worked, we built automated dev environment shutdown based on tags that saved us about $8K/month. Took maybe two days to implement.
Compliance and Governance
Q: How do we make sure people actually follow our tagging standards?
A: This is 60% technology, 40% not being a pain in the ass about it. You need multiple layers:
Technical controls - Service Control Policies to block untagged resource creation, Config rules to catch stuff that slips through, automated remediation where possible. But the cultural piece is huge. Make sure people understand why tagging helps them personally, not just the business. Nobody cares about corporate cost allocation, but everyone cares about faster troubleshooting.
Also, don't make your standards impossible to follow. I've seen tagging policies that required 15 minutes of form-filling per resource. Guess how well that worked.
Q: What are the security implications of tagging?
A: Tagging generally makes security better, not worse. You can automate policy application, speed up incident response, maintain compliance more easily. The main risk is accidentally putting sensitive data in tag values, which I've definitely seen happen.
Basic rules: no secrets in tags, no PII, use IAM to control tag access, audit tag content periodically. I usually recommend treating tag values as if they're visible to everyone in the organization, because they basically are.
Q: How do we handle multi-cloud tagging?
A: Keep it simple and focus on business concepts, not technical implementation. Your tag keys should make sense whether you're on AWS, Azure, or GCP.
Build translation layers for provider-specific stuff, maintain centralized governance, consider third-party tools if you're managing serious multi-cloud complexity. But honestly, most places I've worked aren't actually doing meaningful multi-cloud - they're doing AWS with some legacy stuff elsewhere.
Common Problems
Q: Developers are complaining that tagging slows them down. What do we do?
A: Developer friction will kill your tagging program faster than anything else. I've seen perfectly good tagging strategies fail because developers found ways to work around them.
Solutions that actually work: integrate with existing workflows (CI/CD, IaC templates), provide good defaults, make it as automatic as possible, and show developers how tagging helps them personally. Faster troubleshooting, better cost visibility for their projects, easier resource management.
Keep it simple. If your tagging requirements can't fit on a sticky note, they're too complex.
Q: We have thousands of existing untagged resources. Where do we start?
A: Don't try to boil the ocean. Prioritize ruthlessly:
- Most expensive production resources first
- Anything supporting critical business functions
- Stuff with obvious business context (easier to tag correctly)
- Dev/test resources last
Use automated inference where you can, but plan on manual review for anything expensive or important. I usually budget about 10 hours per 1000 resources for proper tagging, assuming decent automation.
Q: How do we prevent tag proliferation and maintain consistency?
A: You need governance, but don't make it bureaucratic hell. Simple approval process for new tags, regular cleanup of unused tags, good documentation, automated validation, quarterly reviews.
I like the "golden path" approach - make the right way the easy way. Provide templates, examples, automation. Make it harder to do tagging wrong than to do it right.
Advanced Stuff
Q: Can we use tags for automated disaster recovery?
A: Absolutely, and it's pretty slick when done right. CriticalityLevel tags for recovery sequencing, RecoveryTier tags for automation priority, BackupSchedule tags for policy automation, DataClassification tags for replication rules.
I built a DR system at my last job that used tags to automatically sequence recovery across three AZs. Saved us probably 2 hours of manual coordination during our last real outage.
Q: How does this integrate with existing ITSM processes?
A: Tag integration with ITSM can be really powerful if done thoughtfully. CMDB synchronization, incident management automation, change validation, comprehensive asset management.
Key is making sure your tagging scheme matches how your ITSM processes actually work, not some theoretical ideal. I've seen too many implementations fail because they tried to force existing processes to match perfect tagging rather than the other way around.
Q: What's the relationship between tagging and cloud security posture?
A: Tags can massively improve your security game. Automated policy application based on resource classification, compliance monitoring, faster incident response, context-aware security group management.
But don't get fancy until you get the basics right. I've seen places try to build elaborate security automation on top of inconsistent tagging. Fix your tagging hygiene first, then build cool security stuff on top.
Top comments (0)